Skip to content

📢 Open to New Features & Improvements for Fault Tolerance #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Kluzko opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

📢 Open to New Features & Improvements for Fault Tolerance #2

Kluzko opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@Kluzko
Copy link
Owner

Kluzko commented Feb 6, 2025

I’m open to new features and ideas to improve the current code and make it more fault-tolerant. If you have suggestions for handling errors, optimizing performance, or improving stability, please share them here!

What You Can Contribute

✅ Improve error handling (e.g., better handling of network failures)
✅ Optimize caching & reduce unnecessary API calls
✅ Enhance logging & debugging features
✅ Propose new architecture improvements
✅ Any other ideas to make the library more robust!

How to Suggest a Feature

Describe your idea clearly – What problem does it solve?
Explain how it improves the current code – Why is it better?
Provide examples or code snippets if possible.

I welcome all contributions! Feel free to discuss your ideas below. 🚀

@pallasite99
Copy link

pallasite99 commented Feb 9, 2025

Here are some key improvements for dukascopy-fx:

  1. Error Handling: Implement retry with exponential backoff, set timeouts, and improve error messages.
  2. Optimize Caching: Add cache validation and configurable policies to reduce redundant API calls.
  3. Enhanced Logging: Use structured logging, log levels, and trace identifiers for better debugging.
  4. Architecture Improvements: Introduce async processing, modular design, and dependency injection.
  5. Additional Enhancements: Strengthen input validation, expand test coverage, and integrate CI for stability.

1️⃣ Implement Retry with Exponential Backoff for Network Requests

🚨 Problem

Network failures (e.g., API rate limiting, connectivity issues) can cause immediate request failures, requiring manual retries.

✅ Solution

Implement an automatic retry mechanism with exponential backoff to enhance resilience.

🔧 Code Example (Python)

import time
import requests

def fetch_with_retry(url, max_retries=5, backoff_factor=2):
    retries = 0
    while retries < max_retries:
        try:
            response = requests.get(url, timeout=5)
            response.raise_for_status()
            return response.json()
        except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
            retries += 1
            wait_time = backoff_factor ** retries
            print(f"Request failed ({e}), retrying in {wait_time} seconds...")
            time.sleep(wait_time)
    
    raise Exception("Max retries reached. Request failed.")

# Example usage
data = fetch_with_retry("https://api.example.com/data")

🔥 Why It’s Better

✔ Prevents unnecessary failures by retrying failed requests automatically.
✔ Uses exponential delay to avoid overloading the API.
✔ Fully configurable retry count and backoff timing.


2️⃣ Optimize Caching & Reduce Unnecessary API Calls

🚨 Problem

Redundant API calls lead to performance issues and excessive server requests.

✅ Solution

Use in-memory caching to store previous responses and reduce duplicate API calls.

🔧 Code Example (Python using functools.lru_cache)

from functools import lru_cache
import requests

@lru_cache(maxsize=100)  # Cache up to 100 unique responses
def fetch_data(url):
    response = requests.get(url, timeout=5)
    response.raise_for_status()
    return response.json()

# Example usage
data = fetch_data("https://api.example.com/data")

🔥 Why It’s Better

Faster responses by avoiding redundant requests.
Reduces API rate limits and unnecessary load.
✔ Configurable cache size for memory efficiency.


3️⃣ Enhance Logging & Debugging

🚨 Problem

Logs are hard to read, inconsistent, and lack traceability.

✅ Solution

Implement structured logging with log levels for better debugging and monitoring.

🔧 Code Example (Python using logging)

import logging

# Configure logging
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO, format="%(asctime)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s")

def fetch_data(url):
    logging.info(f"Fetching data from {url}")
    try:
        response = requests.get(url, timeout=5)
        response.raise_for_status()
        logging.info("Data fetched successfully")
        return response.json()
    except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
        logging.error(f"Request failed: {e}")
        raise

# Example usage
data = fetch_data("https://api.example.com/data")

🔥 Why It’s Better

✔ Provides timestamped logs for better tracking.
✔ Supports different log levels (INFO, WARNING, ERROR).
✔ Helps with debugging failures quickly.


4️⃣ Architecture Improvements

🚨 Problem

The current structure lacks modularity and scalability.

✅ Solution

Refactor into a modular design with dependency injection to improve maintainability.

🔧 Code Example (Python)

class APIClient:
    def __init__(self, base_url):
        self.base_url = base_url

    def fetch_data(self, endpoint):
        response = requests.get(f"{self.base_url}/{endpoint}", timeout=5)
        response.raise_for_status()
        return response.json()

# Inject dependency
client = APIClient("https://api.example.com")
data = client.fetch_data("data")

🔥 Why It’s Better

Decouples dependencies for easier unit testing.
✔ Improves code reusability and modularity.
✔ Facilitates future enhancements with minimal changes.


5️⃣ Additional Enhancements

🚀 Strengthen Input Validation

  • Validate all external inputs to prevent crashes and security risks.
  • Example: Use pydantic for type-checked data validation.
from pydantic import BaseModel

class APIResponse(BaseModel):
    id: int
    value: str

response = APIResponse.parse_obj({"id": 123, "value": "example"})

🚀 Expand Test Coverage

  • Write unit and integration tests to cover edge cases.
  • Example: Use pytest for automated testing.
import pytest
from my_module import fetch_data

def test_fetch_data():
    result = fetch_data("https://api.example.com/data")
    assert "expected_key" in result

pytest.main()

🚀 Set Up Continuous Integration (CI)

  • Use GitHub Actions to automate testing and code quality checks.
  • Example .github/workflows/test.yml:
name: Run Tests

on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - name: Set up Python
        uses: actions/setup-python@v4
        with:
          python-version: "3.10"
      - name: Install dependencies
        run: pip install -r requirements.txt
      - name: Run tests
        run: pytest

🎯 Summary

Feature Benefit
🔄 Retry with Exponential Backoff Prevents request failures & avoids API overload
🔥 Optimized Caching Reduces redundant API calls & improves performance
📜 Structured Logging Easier debugging & monitoring
🏗️ Modular Architecture Improves maintainability & scalability
🔍 Input Validation & Testing Prevents crashes & enhances stability
🚀 Continuous Integration Ensures code quality & automates testing

These suggestions will boost reliability, performance, and maintainability in my opinion.

@pallasite99
Copy link

Suggested Architecture Improvements

Below is a diagram illustrating proposed improvements to the DukascopyFxService architecture:

+------------------+
|  Client Request  |
+------------------+
        |
        v
+------------------+
|    API Call     |
+------------------+
        |
        v
+---------------------------+
|   DukascopyFxService      |
+---------------------------+
        |
        v
+--------------------+
|  Validation Layer  |
+--------------------+
        |
        v
+------------------+
|  Cache Layer    |
+------------------+
    |       |
    |       v
    |   +---------------------+
    |   |  Return Cached Data |
    |   +---------------------+
    |       |
    v       v
+------------------+
|  Data Fetcher   |
+------------------+
        |
        v
+-------------------+
| Parsing Layer    |
+-------------------+
        |
        v
+----------------------+
|  Data Processing   |
+----------------------+
    |       |
    |       v
    |   +----------------+
    |   | Store in Cache |
    |   +----------------+
    v       v
+------------------+
|  Client Response |
+------------------+

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants