You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’ve been implementing an Actuator Line Model (ALM) for an H-VAWT in water, following a published paper, to evaluate how accurately this method predicts output torque compared to experimental results. To build the model, I collected data for multiple angles of attack and Reynolds numbers and interpolated the polar coefficients.
My current results are:
Time 49700: ALM Torque = 16.7655 N·m, Avg ALM Torque = 44.9571 N·m, Avg Power = 282.4738 W, Wake Torque = 41.9914 N·m
Wake Velocity at 3 radius (~1.35m downstream): 1.4412 m/s (expected <1.62 m/s)
Wake Velocity at 5 radius (~2.25m downstream): 1.4337 m/s (expected deficit, recovering)
Wake Velocity at 10 radius (~4.5m downstream): 1.4535 m/s (expected near 1.62 m/s)
Average domain velocity (x-component, upstream only): 1.6958 m/s (expected ~1.62 m/s in steady state)
I’m trying to determine whether there are major flaws in my implementation, or if I might be misunderstanding certain FluidX3D functions used in my code. Any feedback or corrections would be greatly appreciated.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I’ve been implementing an Actuator Line Model (ALM) for an H-VAWT in water, following a published paper, to evaluate how accurately this method predicts output torque compared to experimental results. To build the model, I collected data for multiple angles of attack and Reynolds numbers and interpolated the polar coefficients.
My current results are:
Time 49700: ALM Torque = 16.7655 N·m, Avg ALM Torque = 44.9571 N·m, Avg Power = 282.4738 W, Wake Torque = 41.9914 N·m
Wake Velocity at 3 radius (~1.35m downstream): 1.4412 m/s (expected <1.62 m/s)
Wake Velocity at 5 radius (~2.25m downstream): 1.4337 m/s (expected deficit, recovering)
Wake Velocity at 10 radius (~4.5m downstream): 1.4535 m/s (expected near 1.62 m/s)
Average domain velocity (x-component, upstream only): 1.6958 m/s (expected ~1.62 m/s in steady state)
I’m trying to determine whether there are major flaws in my implementation, or if I might be misunderstanding certain FluidX3D functions used in my code. Any feedback or corrections would be greatly appreciated.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions