Skip to content

Update storing-artifacts.md #97

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ncsokas
Copy link

@ncsokas ncsokas commented Jul 7, 2025

This pull request updates the labs/storing-artifacts.md file to introduce an extra exercise to reorganize the workflow for better efficiency and alignment with best practices. The changes include breaking the workflow into dedicated jobs (build, test, and lint), optimizing artifact usage, and improving parallelism.

Enhancements to the tutorial:

  • Added an "Extra Exercise" section to guide users on reorganizing their workflows into three dedicated jobs: build, test, and lint. This includes separating responsibilities and improving efficiency.

Workflow improvements:

  • Updated the Build job to upload only the necessary build artifact instead of the entire source code.
  • Added a new Test job that runs after the Build job, downloads the build artifact, and executes unit tests against it.
  • Modified the Linting job to run in parallel by removing the dependency on the Build job and replacing the artifact download step with a repository checkout step.

@ncsokas ncsokas requested review from moller2866 and amrutashety July 7, 2025 18:30
Copy link

@moller2866 moller2866 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! And as you said so yourself @ncsokas , we might have to look at the other exercises to align with the best practice structure.

But lets wait with the merge until the rest of the exercises is updated 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants