You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Before contributing, make sure the new link you'd like to add is a good
123
-
candidate.
122
+
Before contributing, make sure the new link you'd like to add is a good candidate.
124
123
125
-
Here is a non-restrictive list of items which are good candidates for inclusion
126
-
in the `awesome-falsehood` list.
124
+
Here is a non-restrictive list of items which are good candidates for inclusion in the `awesome-falsehood` list.
127
125
128
126
#### Falsehood articles
129
127
130
-
Articles following the *falsehood* schema are prime candidates for inclusion in
131
-
this awesome list.
128
+
Articles following the *falsehood* schema are prime candidates for inclusion in this awesome list.
132
129
133
-
These articles starts with the hypothesis that developers have a naive and
134
-
simple view of a domain. Then proceed to list a set of candid assumptions that
135
-
might be held by programmers. Each one is intentionally false, and in their
136
-
best form are illustrated with a counter-example.
130
+
These articles starts with the hypothesis that developers have a naive and simple view of a domain. Then proceed to list a set of candid assumptions that might be held by programmers. Each one is intentionally false, and in their best form are illustrated with a counter-example.
137
131
138
-
A list of falsehood is crafted as a progression that is designed to refine
139
-
concepts. Having read the whole list of falsehood, the reader should possess a
140
-
better overview of a domain while dispelling its myths, point out common
141
-
pitfalls and demonstrate its subtleties.
132
+
A list of falsehood is crafted as a progression that is designed to refine concepts. Having read the whole list of falsehood, the reader should possess a better overview of a domain while dispelling its myths, point out common pitfalls and demonstrate its subtleties.
142
133
143
-
*falsehood* articles are, in a sense, a suite of wordy unit-tests covering
144
-
extensive edge-cases provided by real-world usage. The world is messy.
145
-
Discovering a domain to be much more complex than anticipated will lead to
146
-
frustrations. And cause flipping tables `(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻`. This is the sign of a
147
-
great candidate for that list!
134
+
*falsehood* articles are, in a sense, a suite of wordy unit-tests covering extensive edge-cases provided by real-world usage. The world is messy. Discovering a domain to be much more complex than anticipated will lead to frustrations. And cause flipping tables `(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻`. This is the sign of a great candidate for that list!
148
135
149
-
Articles featuring items that are applicable to one product (or a service) and
150
-
one only can't be considered as generic enough and should be avoided.
136
+
Articles featuring items that are applicable to one product (or a service) and one only can't be considered as generic enough and should be avoided.
151
137
152
138
#### Libraries
153
139
154
-
Programming libraries or modules are good candidates too, if they solve or
155
-
reduce the complexities pointed to by *falsehood* articles above.
140
+
Programming libraries or modules are good candidates too, if they solve or reduce the complexities pointed to by *falsehood* articles above.
156
141
157
142
That way we can put back tables in place. `┬─┬ ノ( ゜-゜ノ)`
158
143
159
144
#### Data structures
160
145
161
-
Data models and structures generic enough to cover and address most of the
162
-
falsehoods are also welcome in this page.
146
+
Data models and structures generic enough to cover and address most of the falsehoods are also welcome in this page.
163
147
164
148
## FAQ
165
149
@@ -189,7 +173,7 @@ Which is true.
189
173
190
174
I have no issue replacing the original URL with an alternative archived/cached link if the original is no longer reachable.
191
175
192
-
Broken URLs are frustrating. We will fix them one by one. Some have been moved to a new domain. Some have completely disappear, so we'll replace them with a `archive.org` link.
176
+
Broken URLs are frustrating. We will fix them one by one. Some have been moved to a new domain. Some have completely disappear, so we'll replace them with an [archived link](#url).
193
177
194
178
If you find a broken one, please propose a PR to fix it. Or just report it as an issue and I'll do the work.
195
179
@@ -203,7 +187,7 @@ There is no rush to pre-emptively archive content. Incentives exists for others
203
187
- Popular content in this list are naturally archived by users who value them.
204
188
- Authors who cares about their content, or benefits from the SEO juice this list provides, have an incentive to keep them available at their original URL.
205
189
206
-
Despites these incentives, there is still a non-zero chance for content to disappear entirely from the web, with no archived copy in `archive.org`. That's not the end of the world. Maybe the content wasn't worth it, and not good for inclusion in the first place. Think of this edge-case as a natural selection process on content, which helps natural curation.
190
+
Despites these incentives, there is still a non-zero chance for content to disappear entirely from the web, with no [archived copy](#url). That's not the end of the world. Maybe the content wasn't worth it, and not good for inclusion in the first place. Think of this edge-case as a natural selection process on content, which helps natural curation.
207
191
208
192
### Why removes inactive GitHub projects?
209
193
@@ -229,14 +213,17 @@ If your link was rejected, it must have been motivated and explained to the cont
229
213
230
214
Some reasons for rejection, which often overlaps, includes:
231
215
232
-
- deviance from these contribution guidelines
233
-
- violation of the [code of conduct](code-of-conduct.md)
234
216
- duplicate content
235
-
- lack of motivation in what the new link adds to the existing corpus
236
217
- lack of originality
237
-
- overcrowded section that [needs more curation than additional content](https://github.com/kdeldycke/awesome-iam/pull/76)
238
-
-[commercially-sponsored content only proposed for SEO](https://github.com/kdeldycke/awesome-falsehood/pull/31#issuecomment-407667679)
218
+
- rehash of existing content
219
+
- no motivation to explain what the new link adds to the existing corpus
220
+
- overcrowded section that [does not need more content, but more curation](https://github.com/kdeldycke/awesome-iam/pull/76)
221
+
-[not generic enough, or too specific to a single product or company](https://github.com/kdeldycke/awesome-falsehood/pull/31#issuecomment-407667679)
222
+
- marketing copy made to juice the list for SEO
223
+
-[too much URLs already pointing out to the same commercial domain name](https://github.com/kdeldycke/awesome-iam/pull/179#issuecomment-3023031941) (2 links are enough)
239
224
- lack of feedback from the contributor on raised questions
225
+
- deviance from these contribution guidelines
226
+
- violation of the [code of conduct](code-of-conduct.md)
0 commit comments