Can't find IsIterableContainingInAnyOrder matcher

[dkandalov]

If I am missing something, what is the idiomatic way to do it HamKrest?
Otherwise, are there any plans to implement this (are pull requests welcome)?

[npryce]

It's not implemented yet. In HamKrest, I'd call it containsAll to match contains.

PRs are welcome.

[dkandalov]

I raised this PR #15 (but forgot to reference issue in commit name).

[corbym]

containsInAnyOrder is entirely different from contains or containsAll for lists (as mentioned in #37) - So I would suggest calling it containsInAnyOrder as per hamcrest.