You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for highlighting this use case. I'm interested in contributing to the development of more complex stencils for PyCLAW's 1D fluid solvers. After reviewing the Stegoton 1D application, I would like to take a shot at benchmarking the PyCLAW 1D fluid solvers mentioned in this issue. As a beginner, I see this as a very great opportunity for me to deepen my understanding of computational fluid dynamics and stencil operations beyond the standard Laplace equation.
After reviewing, I would like to propose the following contribution with the below plan:
Set up the stegoton1d example: I'll begin by cloning the PyCLAW repository and running the stegoton1d example provided in the
link: https://github.com/clawpack/pyclaw/tree/master/apps/stegoton1d. This will give me a baseline understanding of the solvers' behavior.
Develop benchmarking scripts: I'll create Python scripts using the time module or a dedicated benchmarking tool like timelit to measure the execution time of the solvers for different problem sizes and configurations.
Implement various stencil operations: I'll explore different stencil implementations, potentially using NumPy or Numba for optimization, and compare their performance. This will help me to identify the most efficient methods for complex stencil
operations.
Compare against a known implementation: If possible, I'll compare the performance against a known, optimized implementation of a similar fluid solver (e.g., in Fortran or C) to assess the efficiency of the pure Python approach.
Documentation and Reporting: I'll document my findings and provide the benchmarking code and results in a pull request for review. This will include detailed performance metrics and potential areas for further optimization.
Let me know if you have any specific requirements or suggestions for this benchmarking effort. I am eager to receive your feedback and guidance to ensure my contribution aligns with the project's goals.
PyCLAW has a number of pure python 1D fluid solvers, would be a good use case for stencils that are a bit more complicated than Laplace's equation.
https://github.com/clawpack/pyclaw/tree/master/apps/stegoton_1d
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: