-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
OCPBUGS-54188: Update Pod interactions with Topology Manager policies #95111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@amolnar-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54188, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
🤖 Fri Jul 18 13:24:37 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://95111--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/post_installation_configuration/node-tasks.html |
@amolnar-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54188, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
some comments inside
a9adc33
to
b6a0711
Compare
b6a0711
to
d4b4053
Compare
@@ -32,9 +32,11 @@ spec: | |||
memory: "100Mi" | |||
---- | |||
|
|||
If the selected policy is anything other than `none`, Topology Manager would not consider either of these `Pod` specifications. | |||
If the selected policy is anything other than `none`, Topology Manager would process all the pods and it enforces resource alignment only for the `Guaranteed` Qos `Pod` specification. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@amolnar-rh: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Version(s): 4.12, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16. 4.17, 4.18, 4.19, 4.20
Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-54188
Link to docs preview:
QE review:
Additional information: