-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
Add benchmark_single_table_aws function #417
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #417 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.56% 68.74% +0.17%
==========================================
Files 20 21 +1
Lines 1422 1622 +200
==========================================
+ Hits 975 1115 +140
- Misses 447 507 +60
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
ccc4c05
to
647f17a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's ok that output_folder is in a different place in terms of order for this function than benchmark_single_table
647f17a
to
8ebc6b7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really like the changes! I left one small comment but I think this is great
d4e3d1d
to
6f142aa
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One small comment. This looks great! Thank you for addressing the comments
6f142aa
to
6364280
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two small comments then
eab6ecb
to
662786d
Compare
caacb63
to
36b8dea
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left one final comment, it should be good to go after that
sdgym/s3.py
Outdated
@@ -144,3 +150,52 @@ def write_csv(data, path, aws_key, aws_secret): | |||
""" | |||
data_contents = data.to_csv(index=False).encode('utf-8') | |||
write_file(data_contents, path, aws_key, aws_secret) | |||
|
|||
|
|||
def _parse_s3_uri(s3_uri): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this method the same as parse_s3_path
which already exists?
7636acf
to
917d2e3
Compare
Resolve #414
CU-86b5ewpu4
@amontanez24
additional_datasets_folder
parameter inbenchmark_single_table_aws()
? Should it be an S3 bucket, or could it be a local dataset also?benchmark_single_table()
output_folder
comes aftertimeout
while it's the first parameter inbenchmark_single_table_aws()