glossary of the benchmarks project #14
Replies: 5 comments 3 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Notice that the benchmarks glossary does not include a section on soil threats. However all the known threats occur in other sections, such as indicators, but then without their negative connotation. For example "carbon stock" vs "decline in carbon stock". I wonder if soilwise supports this approach of listing threats in their neutral form under indicators. Or should soilwise use a dedicated codelist of soil threat keywords to be assigned to metadata records. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I propose to the persons in charge of the glossary taru.sanden to put it in SKOS but it is a work to be done. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This glossary looks like a very clear two-tier structure, which means that if we import SKOS, we would use the "concept scheme"? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi Paul, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
tThe benchmarks project maintains a glossary at https://soilhealthbenchmarks.eu/glossary
The glossary has adoped some concepts of the landmark glossary
The glossary is not available in a skos model, it is maintained in a wordpress instance
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions