Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks for the interesting suggestion! Due to how Bagshui’s toolbars are coded, this isn’t currently easy to achieve, but I’ll keep it in mind if toolbar customization is ever added. I do know that warlocks have it rough in Vanilla with the proliferation of soul shards. As you mentioned, virtual item stacking would be another way to mitigate this, and it’s also the solution more likely to be implemented first. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What will your feature request solve?
The toolbar (both top and bottom) have quite some empty space that is currently unused.
As a warlock, i have a soul shard bag with Soul Shards, Infernal Stones and Demonic Figurines. I'd like to hide all of that stuff by default (i mean, the whole associated groups that contain those items), but simply have a soul shard icon on a toolbar alongside a number that displays how many soul shards total i have.
The feature could possibly have the same logic for any item (can be bandages, potions, etc...).
While it is still possible to hide soul shards for instance, i would still like to have their counter displayed on the toolbar for that matter.
Also, currently, a number is displayed on the soul shard bag, that number doesn't separate soul shards from infernal stones and demonic figurines, which makes this display not quite optimal.


Describe the solution you'd like
In edit mode, add the option to add an item in the toolbar (like how you add a group for example). Once added, the item's icon is displayed in the toolbar, alongside its counter.
Describe alternatives you've considered
An alternative solution would be to "virtually group up" stacks of certain items (probably make it customizable as for which item gets this treatment) into a single stack, so instead of having 19 stacks of 3 soul shards, there will be 1 stack of 57 soul shards for example. There's a discussion about such a solution already, here:
#53
Additional context
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions