@@ -132,4 +132,44 @@ But no... that's the thing with Reinforcement Learning, you're not merely
132
132
teaching what to do, but what to value. And that distinction changes
133
133
everything!
134
134
135
+ .. _why-now :
136
+
137
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
138
+ Why Now?
139
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
140
+
141
+ If you read that above quote, it is pretty evident that Machine Learning,
142
+ conceptually, isn't new. Arthur Samuel coined the term in 1959, describing it
143
+ as the field that gives "computers the ability to learn without being
144
+ explicitly programmed."
145
+
146
+ So why has it flourished now, decades later?
147
+
148
+ Three converging forces. First, the explosion of data, from smartphones,
149
+ sensors, web activity, and beyond. Second, the rise of affordable computational
150
+ power, particularly via GPUs (and more recently, TPUs). And third, substantial
151
+ algorithmic innovation, most notably the resurgence of deep learning,
152
+ championed by LeCun, Bengio, and Hinton (The Holy Trinity of Deep Learning),
153
+ among others.
154
+
155
+ In essence, we now possess the raw ingredients, data, compute, and mathematical
156
+ rigour, that pioneers of the field could only dream of.
157
+
158
+ .. _what-machine-learning-isnt :
159
+
160
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
161
+ What Machine Learning Isn't?
162
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
163
+
164
+ Before we get too swept up in the enthusiasm, a caveat.
165
+
166
+ Machine Learning is not magic.
167
+
168
+ It is **not ** intelligence, at least not in the human sense. It does not
169
+ understand. It discerns patterns, not meaning. To be absolutely blunt, Machine
170
+ Learning is basically your highschool mathematics on steroids. I've built
171
+ models that seemed astonishingly accurate at diagosing medical conditions,
172
+ until I realised they were picking up on scanner artefacts or institutional
173
+ quirks.
174
+
135
175
.. _Snake game : https://gist.github.com/xames3/563c99598c2aa1dd84e3c9494b648063
0 commit comments