Skip to content

Commit 5695508

Browse files
committed
docs: upstream more content about ML
Signed-off-by: Akshay Mestry <[email protected]>
1 parent 29de83d commit 5695508

File tree

1 file changed

+40
-0
lines changed
  • docs/source/learning-out-loud/ml-explained

1 file changed

+40
-0
lines changed

docs/source/learning-out-loud/ml-explained/ml101.rst

Lines changed: 40 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -132,4 +132,44 @@ But no... that's the thing with Reinforcement Learning, you're not merely
132132
teaching what to do, but what to value. And that distinction changes
133133
everything!
134134

135+
.. _why-now:
136+
137+
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
138+
Why Now?
139+
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
140+
141+
If you read that above quote, it is pretty evident that Machine Learning,
142+
conceptually, isn't new. Arthur Samuel coined the term in 1959, describing it
143+
as the field that gives "computers the ability to learn without being
144+
explicitly programmed."
145+
146+
So why has it flourished now, decades later?
147+
148+
Three converging forces. First, the explosion of data, from smartphones,
149+
sensors, web activity, and beyond. Second, the rise of affordable computational
150+
power, particularly via GPUs (and more recently, TPUs). And third, substantial
151+
algorithmic innovation, most notably the resurgence of deep learning,
152+
championed by LeCun, Bengio, and Hinton (The Holy Trinity of Deep Learning),
153+
among others.
154+
155+
In essence, we now possess the raw ingredients, data, compute, and mathematical
156+
rigour, that pioneers of the field could only dream of.
157+
158+
.. _what-machine-learning-isnt:
159+
160+
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
161+
What Machine Learning Isn't?
162+
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
163+
164+
Before we get too swept up in the enthusiasm, a caveat.
165+
166+
Machine Learning is not magic.
167+
168+
It is **not** intelligence, at least not in the human sense. It does not
169+
understand. It discerns patterns, not meaning. To be absolutely blunt, Machine
170+
Learning is basically your highschool mathematics on steroids. I've built
171+
models that seemed astonishingly accurate at diagosing medical conditions,
172+
until I realised they were picking up on scanner artefacts or institutional
173+
quirks.
174+
135175
.. _Snake game: https://gist.github.com/xames3/563c99598c2aa1dd84e3c9494b648063

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)