Skip to content

Conversation

AdelaCorbeanu
Copy link

Problem

The information on LRS in the current article is conflicting, one time it says LRS replicates to a single physical location, and later one it says LRS replicates to one or more availability zones (which is not true).

Solution

Emphasize that LRS replicates to a single physical location.

Update information about Locally Redundant Storage
Update information about Locally Redundant Storage
Copy link
Contributor

@AdelaCorbeanu : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 501091b:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/storage/common/storage-redundancy.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@stevenmatthew

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Aug 4, 2025
@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@stevenmatthew Could you review this proposed update to your article and enter #sign-off in a comment if it's ready to merge?

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants