-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 270
[perf] Batch rpyc calls in multimodal path #960
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @SangChengC, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on enhancing the robustness and performance of inter-process communication, specifically with RPyC, within the system's multimodal embedding cache. It resolves potential serialization problems by configuring RPyC to allow pickle
and introduces significant performance gains by converting numerous single-item cache interactions into efficient batch operations, thereby optimizing the processing of multimodal data.
Highlights
- RPyC Configuration: Enabled
allow_pickle
for all RPyC connections to ensure proper serialization and deserialization of complex Python objects, addressing potential communication issues. - Cache System Optimization: Refactored the embedding cache manager to support batch operations for allocating, retrieving, and setting the status of multiple items simultaneously. This includes new
alloc_batch
,get_items_data
,set_items_data
,get_items_embed
, andset_items_embed
methods. - Multimodal Data Processing Efficiency: Updated various client components (HTTP, Audio, Visual servers, and model RPCs) to leverage the new batch RPyC cache operations, significantly reducing network round trips and improving performance when handling multiple multimodal inputs like images and audio.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
2f96b1a
to
b5e2d33
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request addresses an issue with rpyc
and refactors the embedding cache logic to use batch operations. A critical bug was identified where audio embedding logic incorrectly uses data caching functions. Additionally, medium-severity issues were found, including an incorrect type hint and performance improvement opportunities in the cache implementation. The security implications of enabling pickle in rpyc
were also noted.
aadbaca
to
aa1c586
Compare
3c93ce3
to
0947f9e
Compare
No description provided.