Skip to content

no longer proxy to hydra from netlify #1154

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented Jun 6, 2025

The infra team would like to have the freedom to have longer maintenance periods of hydra if necessary. Also we want to reduce the load on the service. This commit makes nix.dev mirror the manual as snapshots. During the build process we download the tarballs from github releases

The infra team would like to have the freedom to have longer maintainace
periods of hydra if necessary. Also we want to reduce the load on the
service. This commit makes nix.dev mirror the manual as snapshots.
During the build process we download the tarballs from github releases
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
{
"version": "2025.01.06",
"sha256": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs to be updated. Once we have the green light.

if [ -f "nix/development-manual.json" ]; then
existing_hash=$(jq -r '.sha256' nix/development-manual.json)
if [ "$existing_hash" = "$current_hash" ]; then
echo >&2 "Manual with same content already exists"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully the manual actually doesn't change that often. So we don't always need to update this.

@Mic92
Copy link
Member Author

Mic92 commented Jun 6, 2025

For context at the moment the development manual is also broken as a result of adding anubis in front of hydra.

@Mic92
Copy link
Member Author

Mic92 commented Jun 6, 2025

cc @mweinelt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant