Clean up review process docs

[sebastianduesing]

Closes #2526. This PR cleans up the docs on the new ontology review process, favoring the well-maintained docs/OntologiesReviewWorkflow.md page as the go-to page for review process information and eliminating other less well-maintained stub pages. Changes are as follows:

Removed docs/ReviewCriteriaPolicies.md
This stub page was extremely sparse, and no other pages on the site linked to it.

Removed docs/ReviewProcessGuidelines.md
This page contained no information that couldn't already be found in more intuitive locations—the section on how to request an ontology review has its own FAQ page, the information in the sections on review priority and the review workflow can be found in the Ontology Review Workflow page. Only one other page in the site linked to this page. The change to docs/CompletedReviews.md points that link to the Ontology Review Workflow page instead.

I also added a link to the Ontology Review Workflow page to the FAQ page on registering an ontology, as a way to point to the steps following submission.

If I'm wrong and there are some useful bits of information on either of the deleted pages that can't be found elsewhere, please let me know, and I'll make sure that information gets moved into the Ontology Review Workflow page.

[nataled]

Both these files pertained to the previous manual review process. All information is either outdated or better covered elsewhere. I believe all currently-public pages have been purged of links to the files you are removing. This does bring up something policy-wise. I've never deleted files I knew were not in use (which is why you are finding them now) because I wasn't sure it was 'allowed'. I don't know what the policy is on this (I don't care either way, but I want to make sure I'm doing the right thing when the time comes). Worth bringing up in the next Ops meeting?

…

On 6/26/2025 6:04 PM, Sebastian Duesing wrote: Closes #2526 <#2526>. This PR cleans up the docs on the new ontology review process, favoring the well-maintained |docs/OntologiesReviewWorkflow.md| <https://obofoundry.org/docs/OntologiesReviewWorkflow.html> page as the go-to page for review process information and eliminating other less well-maintained stub pages. Changes are as follows: *Removed |docs/ReviewCriteriaPolicies.md| <https://obofoundry.org/docs/ReviewCriteriaPolicies.html>* This stub page was extremely sparse, and no other pages on the site linked to it. *Removed |docs/ReviewProcessGuidelines.md| <https://obofoundry.org/docs/ReviewProcessGuidelines.html>* This page contained no information that couldn't already be found in more intuitive locations—the section on how to request an ontology review has its own FAQ page, the information in the sections on review priority and the review workflow can be found in the Ontology Review Workflow page. Only one other page in the site linked to this page. The change to |docs/CompletedReviews.md| <https://obofoundry.org/docs/CompletedReviews.html> points that link to the Ontology Review Workflow page instead. I also added a link to the Ontology Review Workflow page to the FAQ page on registering an ontology, as a way to point to the steps following submission. If I'm wrong and there are some useful bits of information on either of the deleted pages that can't be found elsewhere, please let me know, and I'll make sure that information gets moved into the Ontology Review Workflow page. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: #2748 Commit Summary * b4d51a3 <b4d51a3> Clean up review process docs File Changes (4 files <https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/pull/2748/files>) * *M* docs/CompletedReviews.md <https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/pull/2748/files#diff-9ca47850744cae13297cb014434a3acaff40c48d4ccdadd28024a7ce46ac3557> (2) * *D* docs/ReviewCriteriaPolicies.md <https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/pull/2748/files#diff-cd5b4dcb819ea6a1b8e68db70d1549f26abb96aae9b43d3ef763b681219b7223> (14) * *D* docs/ReviewProcessGuidelines.md <https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/pull/2748/files#diff-b70c2173b3f55fd1b3118f6b368ff08940252267d8034f59fb7383b4621002c8> (32) * *M* faq/how-do-i-register-my-ontology.md <https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/pull/2748/files#diff-349ef3d9ffb413285c26ce87cfdee8c9403e12dfcf52b8b1fbbf2f491848ff06> (2) Patch Links: * https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/pull/2748.patch * https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/pull/2748.diff — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2748>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJB7CRQWYWWGJ2ICU7KWYD3FRU55AVCNFSM6AAAAACAHNCOWWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZTGE4DANJYGIYDCOI>. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[sebastianduesing]

Ah, good to know! Thanks for the info. I'll add this to the agenda for the next Ops meeting.