[18.0][FIX] Fix l10n_es_vat_book: Recálculo sin caché #4536
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mpascuall
changed the title
|
Hola @pedrobaeza, podrías indicarme cuál es la mejor opción aquí? Eliminamos directamente el decorador o crees que hay una mejor solución? Muchas gracias! |
pedrobaeza
changed the title
|
Sí, no tiene mucho sentido ese caché sin duda, y está bien eliminarlo. Cambia, eso sí, el mensaje de commit al adecuado (y en inglés a poder ser): https://github.com/OCA/odoo-community.org/blob/master/website/Contribution/CONTRIBUTING.rst#commit-message |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cuándo se calcula el libro de IVA, se marca un partner cómo cliente anónimo y se recalcula, el partner sigue apareciendo con un error.
Esto se debe a la caché, el método get_pos_partner_ids tiene el decorador @ormcache("self.id").
Si lo eliminamos o lo comentamos, lo calcula correctamente.
cc https://github.com/APSL 2518
@miquelalzanillas @lbarry-apsl @BernatObrador @peluko00 @javierobcn @ppyczko please review