DO NOT MERGE: v1.12 branch for comparison to master #202
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nickrobinson251
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
4 times, most recently
from
966538b to
9da665d
Compare
d-netto
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
from
9da665d to
48a5871
Compare
nickrobinson251
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
from
48a5871 to
5974904
Compare
DelveCI
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
7 times, most recently
from
1cff7d7 to
1e6e20d
Compare
DelveCI
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
5 times, most recently
from
02e0f68 to
35024c5
Compare
DelveCI
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
4 times, most recently
from
fb189dc to
7e4f1cb
Compare
DelveCI
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
3 times, most recently
from
7eb4dc1 to
d4a2432
Compare
DelveCI
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
5 times, most recently
from
f36b557 to
4abc802
Compare
DelveCI
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
from
3b1bff6 to
cd0bd93
Compare
``` julia> Base.throw(x::Int) = 1 ERROR: cannot add methods to builtin function `throw` Stacktrace: [1] top-level scope @ REPL[1]:1 ``` (cherry picked from commit 57def4d)
(cherry picked from commit fde79f5)
(cherry picked from commit 9f69961)
…59163) Fixes JuliaLang#59162 (cherry picked from commit f5c55e8)
(cherry picked from commit 1f6eff1)
Fix JuliaLang#59128 Assignment desugaring of `(const (= (|::| x T) rhs))` would pre-expand to, then re-expand `(const x ,(convert-for-type-decl rhs T))`, but two-arg (IR) const is expected to have a simple RHS---closure conversion doesn't recurse here (should it?), giving us partially-lowered IR, and hence our bug. Fix: Pre-expand to the one-arg AST const form `(const (= x ,(convert-for-type-decl rhs T)))` instead. This also gives us a `(latestworld)` we were missing before, so this lowering may have been originally intended. (cherry picked from commit 3de5b9a)
(cherry picked from commit f9b7d27)
Closes JuliaLang#59184 (cherry picked from commit 13f6b3b)
fixes JuliaLang#57749 (cherry picked from commit b35c4f4)
DelveCI
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
from
cd0bd93 to
b8fd347
Compare
DelveCI
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
from
b8fd347 to
8a40fcb
Compare
This had failed to be updated for the LazyLibrary changes to codegen. (cherry picked from commit 46c2a5c)
Fixes the compile time regression in JuliaLang#59134 (does not address the performance regression that should be tracked and bisected) (cherry picked from commit 920df7a)
…s from packages succeed
Prevent transparent huge pages (THP) overallocating pysical memory. Co-authored-by: Adnan Alhomssi <[email protected]>
Prepend `[signal (X) ]thread (Y) ` to each backtrace line that is displayed. Co-authored-by: Diogo Netto <[email protected]>
Also show the signal number when we have it.
Alternative to JuliaLang#58146. We want to compile a subset of the possible specializations of a function. To this end, we have a number of manually written `precompile` statements. Creating this list is, unfortunately, error-prone, and the list is also liable to going stale. Thus we'd like to validate each `precompile` statement in the list. The simple answer is, of course, to actually run the `precompile`s, and we naturally do so, but this takes time. We would like a relatively quick way to check the validity of a `precompile` statement. This is a dev-loop optimization, to allow us to check "is-precompilable" in unit tests. We can't use `hasmethod` as it has both false positives (too loose): ```julia julia> hasmethod(sum, (AbstractVector,)) true julia> precompile(sum, (AbstractVector,)) false julia> Base.isprecompilable(sum, (AbstractVector,)) # <- this PR false ``` and also false negatives (too strict): ```julia julia> bar(@nospecialize(x::AbstractVector{Int})) = 42 bar (generic function with 1 method) julia> hasmethod(bar, (AbstractVector,)) false julia> precompile(bar, (AbstractVector,)) true julia> Base.isprecompilable(bar, (AbstractVector,)) # <- this PR true ``` We can't use `hasmethod && isconcretetype` as it has false negatives (too strict): ```julia julia> has_concrete_method(f, argtypes) = all(isconcretetype, argtypes) && hasmethod(f, argtypes) has_concrete_method (generic function with 1 method) julia> has_concrete_method(bar, (AbstractVector,)) false julia> has_concrete_method(convert, (Type{Int}, Int32)) false julia> precompile(convert, (Type{Int}, Int32)) true julia> Base.isprecompilable(convert, (Type{Int}, Int32)) # <- this PR true ``` `Base.isprecompilable` is essentially `precompile` without the actual compilation.
DelveCI
force-pushed
the
v1.12.0-DEV+RAI
branch
from
8a40fcb to
46775af
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See also RAICode PR https://github.com/RelationalAI/raicode/pull/22602/commits