Skip to content

CompatHelper: bump compat for DifferentiationInterface to 0.7, (keep existing compat) #3727

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request changes the compat entry for the DifferentiationInterface package from 0.6.47 to 0.6.47, 0.7.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.

Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

@oscardssmith
Copy link
Member

Testing locally shows


Split Parameters Test: Error During Test at /home/oscardssmith/.julia/packages/SafeTestsets/raUNr/src/SafeTestsets.jl:30
  Got exception outside of a @test
  LoadError: PreparationMismatchError (inconsistent types between preparation and execution):
    - f!: ✅
    - y: ✅
    - backend: ✅
    - x: ✅
    - contexts: ❌
      - prep: Tuple{DifferentiationInterface.Constant{ModelingToolkit.MTKParameters{Vector{Float64}, Vector{Float64}, Tuple{}, Tuple{}, Tuple{}, Tuple{}}}, DifferentiationInterface.Constant{Nothing}}
      - exec: Tuple{DifferentiationInterface.Constant{ModelingToolkit.MTKParameters{Vector{Float64}, Vector{Float64}, Tuple{}, Tuple{}, Tuple{}, Tuple{}}}, DifferentiationInterface.Constant{Float64}}
  If you are confident that this check is superfluous, you can disable it by running preparation with the keyword argument `strict=Val(false)` inside DifferentiationInterface.

on test/split_parameters.jl:172. Will investigate more tomorrow.

@oscardssmith oscardssmith self-assigned this Jun 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant