feat: resturcture docs #127
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Claude finished @zmzlois's task —— View job PR Review: Documentation Restructuring
|
| Severity | Line(s) | Issue | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | rspress.config.ts:184-225 |
Broken Navigation Links - The sidebar still references deleted files from /learning/concepts/ |
Remove the entire /learning sidebar section or update paths to point to existing files |
| Critical | lib/site.config.tsx:53,276-290 |
Dead Links in Site Config - References to /how-to/existing-app and /concepts/* paths that no longer exist |
Update these links to point to correct paths: /tutorials/existing-app and remove concept links |
| Critical | theme/index.tsx:111 |
404 Page Dead Link - References /how-to/existing-app which was moved |
Update to /tutorials/existing-app |
🔧 High Priority Issues (2 found)
| Severity | Line(s) | Issue | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | rspress.config.ts:430-447 |
Missing Redirects - No redirects defined for the moved/deleted files | Add redirects for all moved files to prevent 404s |
| High | General | Missing Documentation - No explanation of the restructuring logic or rationale | Add a comment in the PR description explaining the new structure |
📋 Medium Priority Issues (3 found)
| Severity | Line(s) | Issue | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medium | rspress-styling-analysis.mdx:1-153 |
Development File Committed - This analysis file should not be in the repo | Move to .gitignore or remove from commit |
| Medium | patches/@rspress__theme-default.patch:1-64 |
Undocumented Patch - New patch file with no explanation of purpose | Add comments explaining why this patch is needed |
| Medium | docs/index.mdx:43-46 |
Broken Internal Links - References to /learning/concepts/module-federation which was deleted |
Update to point to existing content or remove reference |
✅ Low Priority Issues (2 found)
| Severity | Line(s) | Issue | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | package.json:78-81 |
New Patch Dependencies - Added patched dependencies without explanation | Document why these patches are necessary |
| Low | styles/index.css:27-33 |
Brand Color Change - Changed from blue to purple theme without context | Ensure this aligns with brand guidelines |
Detailed Analysis
🔍 Restructuring Logic Assessment
The reorganization follows a logical pattern:
- ✅ Good: Consolidates features under
/docs/features/ - ✅ Good: Groups tutorials under
/docs/tutorials/ - ✅ Good: Removes outdated concept files
- ❌ Issue: Leaves broken references in configuration files
🔒 Security Review
- ✅ No security vulnerabilities identified
- ✅ No exposed secrets or sensitive data
- ✅ External script injections appear safe (New Relic, Twitter)
🏗️ Build System Impact
- ✅ RSPress configuration properly updated for new structure
- ✅ Theme customizations maintained
- ❌ Critical: Broken sidebar navigation will cause build warnings/errors
📝 Code Quality
- ✅ TypeScript configurations maintained
- ✅ Consistent file naming conventions
- ✅ Proper MDX formatting
Required Fixes
// rspress.config.ts - Remove broken sidebar section
const sidebar: Sidebar = {
"/": [
// ... existing sections ...
// REMOVE THIS ENTIRE SECTION:
// "/learning": [
// { text: "Concepts", items: [ /* broken links */ ] }
// ]
],
// Remove the entire /learning section
};// lib/site.config.tsx - Fix broken links
export const SiteConfig: CardProps = {
start: [
{
title: "Adding Zephyr to existing application",
href: "/tutorials/existing-app", // Fixed path
// ...
}
],
// Remove or fix concept links in the concepts section
};// Add redirects to rspress.config.ts
pluginClientRedirects({
redirects: [
// ... existing redirects ...
{ from: "/learning/concepts/terminologies", to: "/features/mf-guide" },
{ from: "/learning/concepts/module-federation", to: "/features/mf-guide" },
{ from: "/learning/concepts/micro-frontend", to: "/features/mf-guide" },
{ from: "/learning/concepts/edge", to: "/general/architecture" },
{ from: "/learning/react-webpack", to: "/tutorials/react-vite" },
{ from: "/how-to/existing-app", to: "/tutorials/existing-app" },
],
}),Overall Assessment
Quality Score: 6/10
Strengths:
- Logical documentation restructuring
- Maintains existing functionality
- Good file organization
Critical Issues:
- Multiple broken internal links
- Missing redirects for moved content
- Incomplete configuration updates
Next Steps
- 🔥 URGENT: Fix all broken links in configuration files
- 📍 HIGH: Add redirects for all moved/deleted files
- 📝 MEDIUM: Clean up development files and document patches
The restructuring concept is solid, but the implementation needs completion to avoid breaking the documentation site.
|
Claude finished @zmzlois's task —— View job PR Review Complete ✅Analyzed this documentation restructuring PR focusing on coding standards, security, performance, maintainability, and potential issues. Todo List:
SummaryDocumentation restructuring that simplifies the site structure by removing incomplete content and reorganizing sections, but introduces broken internal links that need immediate attention. Issues Found
🔧 Detailed AnalysisRestructuring Logic Assessment✅ Positive Changes:
Configuration Changes Review✅ Properly implemented:
Security Analysis✅ No security issues identified:
Performance & Build Impact✅ Minimal impact:
Recommended FixesCritical (Must Fix Before Merge):
# docs/general/question.mdx:19
- [architecture guide](/learning/concepts/architecture)
+ [architecture guide](/general/architecture)
# docs/general/question.mdx:58
- [section](/learning/concepts/module-federation#mf-10-vs-mf-20)
+ <!-- Remove this link - target content was deleted -->
# docs/index.mdx:43
- [Module Federation Deep Dive](/learning/concepts/module-federation#deep-dive)
+ <!-- Remove this link - target content was deleted -->
# docs/index.mdx:46
- [learning section](/learning)
+ <!-- Remove this link - section was removed -->
# docs/index.mdx:55
- [See more recipes](/recipes)
+ [See more tutorials](/tutorials)
// Add to rspress.config.ts pluginClientRedirects
{ from: "^/recipes", to: "/tutorials" },
{ from: "^/how-to/(.*)", to: "/features/$1" },
{ from: "^/learning", to: "/tutorials" },Cleanup (Recommended):
# rspress.config.ts:184-225
- "/learning": [
- // ... entire learning section
- ],Overall AssessmentQuality Score: 7/10 Top 3 Next Steps:
Strengths:
Areas for Improvement:
The restructuring concept is sound and improves the documentation organization, but the execution needs these link fixes to be complete. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What's added in this PR?
[Provide an implementation summary. What did you add beyond the described task? What are the additional details you'd like people to pay attention to? To help people review this PR understand what's changed.]
What's the issues or discussion related to this PR (optional) ?
[Provide some background information related to this PR, including issues or task. Prior to this PR what's the behavior that wasn't expected.]
[If there wasn't discussion related to this PR, you can include the reasoning behind this PR of why you did it.]
Feature related update for this PR (if applicable)?
(Optional) What's left to be done for this PR?
Who do you wish to review this PR other than required reviewers?
(Required) Pre-PR/Merge checklist