Skip to content

vLLM vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 28, 2025 in vllm-project/vllm • Updated May 28, 2025

Package

pip vllm (pip)

Affected versions

>= 0.6.3, < 0.9.0

Patched versions

0.9.0

Description

Summary

A recent review identified several regular expressions in the vllm codebase that are susceptible to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attacks. These patterns, if fed with crafted or malicious input, may cause severe performance degradation due to catastrophic backtracking.

1. vllm/lora/utils.py Line 173

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/2858830c39da0ae153bc1328dbba7680f5fbebe1/vllm/lora/utils.py#L173
Risk Description:

  • The regex r"\((.*?)\)\$?$" matches content inside parentheses. If input such as ((((a|)+)+)+) is passed in, it can cause catastrophic backtracking, leading to a ReDoS vulnerability.
  • Using .*? (non-greedy match) inside group parentheses can be highly sensitive to input length and nesting complexity.

Remediation Suggestions:

  • Limit the input string length.
  • Use a non-recursive matching approach, or write a regex with stricter content constraints.
  • Consider using possessive quantifiers or atomic groups (not supported in Python yet), or split and process before regex matching.

2. vllm/entrypoints/openai/tool_parsers/phi4mini_tool_parser.py Line 52

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/2858830c39da0ae153bc1328dbba7680f5fbebe1/vllm/entrypoints/openai/tool_parsers/phi4mini_tool_parser.py#L52

Risk Description:

  • The regex r'functools\[(.*?)\]' uses .*? to match content inside brackets, together with re.DOTALL. If the input contains a large number of nested or crafted brackets, it can cause backtracking and ReDoS.

Remediation Suggestions:

  • Limit the length of model_output.
  • Use a stricter, non-greedy pattern (avoid matching across extraneous nesting).
  • Prefer re.finditer() and enforce a length constraint on each match.

3. vllm/entrypoints/openai/serving_chat.py Line 351

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/2858830c39da0ae153bc1328dbba7680f5fbebe1/vllm/entrypoints/openai/serving_chat.py#L351

Risk Description:

  • The regex r'.*"parameters":\s*(.*)' can trigger backtracking if current_text is very long and contains repeated structures.
  • Especially when processing strings from unknown sources, .* matching any content is high risk.

Remediation Suggestions:

  • Use a more specific pattern (e.g., via JSON parsing).
  • Impose limits on current_text length.
  • Avoid using .* to capture large blocks of text; prefer structured parsing when possible.

4. benchmarks/benchmark_serving_structured_output.py Line 650

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/2858830c39da0ae153bc1328dbba7680f5fbebe1/benchmarks/benchmark_serving_structured_output.py#L650

Risk Description:

  • The regex r'\{.*\}' is used to extract JSON inside curly braces. If the actual string is very long with unbalanced braces, it can cause backtracking, leading to a ReDoS vulnerability.
  • Although this is used for benchmark correctness checking, it should still handle abnormal inputs carefully.

Remediation Suggestions:

  • Limit the length of actual.
  • Prefer stepwise search for { and } or use a robust JSON extraction tool.
  • Recommend first locating the range with simple string search, then applying regex.

Fix


References

@russellb russellb published to vllm-project/vllm May 28, 2025
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 28, 2025
Reviewed May 28, 2025
Last updated May 28, 2025

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

EPSS score

Weaknesses

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-j828-28rj-hfhp

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.