Allow updating of Load Balancer source CIDR list #11568

CodeBleu · 2025-09-03T13:30:01Z

Switching base to `main` from `4.19` , SEE #10968 for Comment history

Description

This PR will allow the updating of a loadbalancer rules CIDR list via the API.
* Should fix #9313

I have tested this code in 4.19, 4.20, and main branches via simulator and all works

Types of changes

Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
build/CI
test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

Major
Minor

Bug Severity

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Before, the Source CIDR list was blank (Simulator env)

(localcloud) :penguin: > list loadbalancerrules
{
  "count": 1,
  "loadbalancerrule": [
    {
      "account": "admin",
      "algorithm": "roundrobin",
      "cidrlist": "",
      "domain": "ROOT",
      "domainid": "5b6a2947-416b-11f0-9a39-564a8191c23c",
      "domainpath": "/",
      "fordisplay": true,
      "id": "0d8e3cb9-767b-45f3-834d-3f9ce85df901",
      "name": "newlbtest",
      "networkid": "5bb3ecfb-cde3-4821-8822-0c4c8a8e9559",
      "privateport": "3306",
      "protocol": "tcp",
      "publicip": "192.168.2.10",
      "publicipid": "9b2638d7-7330-49c7-9d6e-5b5777f6ca16",
      "publicport": "3306",
      "state": "Add",
      "tags": [],
      "zoneid": "7cb86a09-676e-4f00-ad39-012f0eb2e69d",
      "zonename": "Sandbox-simulator"
    }
  ]
}
(localcloud) :penguin: > update loadbalancerrule id="0d8e3cb9-767b-45f3-834d-3f9ce85df901" cidrlist="1.2.3.4/32"
{
  "loadbalancer": {
    "account": "admin",
    "algorithm": "roundrobin",
    "cidrlist": "1.2.3.4/32",
    "domain": "ROOT",
    "domainid": "5b6a2947-416b-11f0-9a39-564a8191c23c",
    "domainpath": "/",
    "fordisplay": true,
    "id": "0d8e3cb9-767b-45f3-834d-3f9ce85df901",
    "name": "newlbtest",
    "networkid": "5bb3ecfb-cde3-4821-8822-0c4c8a8e9559",
    "privateport": "3306",
    "protocol": "tcp",
    "publicip": "192.168.2.10",
    "publicipid": "9b2638d7-7330-49c7-9d6e-5b5777f6ca16",
    "publicport": "3306",
    "state": "Add",
    "tags": [],
    "zoneid": "7cb86a09-676e-4f00-ad39-012f0eb2e69d",
    "zonename": "Sandbox-simulator"
  }
}
(localcloud) :penguin: > update loadbalancerrule id="0d8e3cb9-767b-45f3-834d-3f9ce85df901" cidrlist=
{
  "loadbalancer": {
    "account": "admin",
    "algorithm": "roundrobin",
    "cidrlist": "",
    "domain": "ROOT",
    "domainid": "5b6a2947-416b-11f0-9a39-564a8191c23c",
    "domainpath": "/",
    "fordisplay": true,
    "id": "0d8e3cb9-767b-45f3-834d-3f9ce85df901",
    "name": "newlbtest",
    "networkid": "5bb3ecfb-cde3-4821-8822-0c4c8a8e9559",
    "privateport": "3306",
    "protocol": "tcp",
    "publicip": "192.168.2.10",
    "publicipid": "9b2638d7-7330-49c7-9d6e-5b5777f6ca16",
    "publicport": "3306",
    "state": "Add",
    "tags": [],
    "zoneid": "7cb86a09-676e-4f00-ad39-012f0eb2e69d",
    "zonename": "Sandbox-simulator"
  }
}

Tested on actual test environment and below is where you can see when it was restricted it didn't connect to mysql, but when opened up and CIDR set to 0.0.0.0/0 it worked. I tested with specific Public IP in CIDR as well (x.x.0.118/32) and this works and you can see in the virtual router for haproxy it set the ACL.

Restricted with wrong IP in source CIDR of LB

⮡ $ mysql -h x.x.x.110 -u root -p
Enter password:
ERROR 2013 (HY000): Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 104

With correct source CIDR or 0.0.0.0/0

$ mysql -h x.x.x.110 -u root -p
Enter password:
Welcome to the MySQL monitor.  Commands end with ; or \g.
Your MySQL connection id is 4730216
Server version: 8.0.33 MySQL Community Server - GPL

Copyright (c) 2000, 2024, Oracle and/or its affiliates.

Oracle is a registered trademark of Oracle Corporation and/or its
affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective
owners.

Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input statement.

mysql> quit
Bye

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

Ran multiple tests with Cloudmonkey against simulator and actual test environment. See above for testing info

* Should fix apache#9313

- Replace manual null-check comparison with Objects.equals for clarity and null safety - Simplify CIDR list rollback to always restore backup value unconditionally - Add JavaDoc for setCidrList method for improved documentation

server/src/main/java/com/cloud/network/lb/LoadBalancingRulesManagerImpl.java

...main/java/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/loadbalancer/UpdateLoadBalancerRuleCmd.java

codecov · 2025-09-03T13:46:16Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 31.25000% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 17.35%. Comparing base (3d6ec29) to head (2fabc02).
⚠️ Report is 19 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...loud/network/lb/LoadBalancingRulesManagerImpl.java	10.00%	5 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...d/user/loadbalancer/UpdateLoadBalancerRuleCmd.java	33.33%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #11568      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     17.36%   17.35%   -0.01%     
  Complexity    15237    15237              
============================================
  Files          5888     5888              
  Lines        525741   525756      +15     
  Branches      64164    64168       +4     
============================================
- Hits          91274    91271       -3     
- Misses       424167   424180      +13     
- Partials      10300    10305       +5

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	`3.63% <ø> (ø)`
unittests	`18.39% <31.25%> (-0.01%)`	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

weizhouapache

code lgtm

weizhouapache · 2025-09-03T14:35:14Z

@blueorangutan package

blueorangutan · 2025-09-03T14:36:04Z

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

blueorangutan · 2025-09-03T15:43:37Z

Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✔️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 14834

Pearl1594

code lgtm.

engine/schema/src/main/java/com/cloud/network/dao/LoadBalancerVO.java

Pearl1594 · 2025-09-03T15:53:58Z

@blueorangutan package

blueorangutan · 2025-09-03T15:56:03Z

@Pearl1594 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

CodeBleu · 2025-09-03T16:32:49Z

@Pearl1594 @weizhouapache Can I get one of you to manually test this and post results? Once that is complete, I believe I can merge it 😄

blueorangutan · 2025-09-03T17:28:08Z

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14835

weizhouapache · 2025-09-03T17:53:43Z

@blueorangutan test

blueorangutan · 2025-09-03T17:56:05Z

@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

harikrishna-patnala

code LGTM

blueorangutan · 2025-09-04T10:10:48Z

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14205)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 55428 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11568-t14205-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 146 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File

CodeBleu · 2025-09-05T13:21:27Z

@harikrishna-patnala Would you be able to test this and post results? I believe I'm just needed that from someone and then I can merge.

Unless @weizhouapache the following Trillian test counts?

Smoke tests completed. 146 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run

DaanHoogland · 2025-09-08T13:16:02Z

@harikrishna-patnala Would you be able to test this and post results? I believe I'm just needed that from someone and then I can merge.

Unless @weizhouapache the following Trillian test counts?

Smoke tests completed. 146 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run

@CodeBleu , do you have a friend and/or colleague that can test? We usually trust any viable test report. Shapeblue has some time/people to test but we are usually stuffed with customer work.

Another thing that might help is to write an integration test that shows it works;

it eases the work for other to validate
it shows it works 🤷

github-actions · 2025-09-11T11:27:09Z

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

CodeBleu added 5 commits September 3, 2025 09:20

Allow updating of Load Balancer source CIDR list

aae95b1

* Should fix apache#9313

Added test coverage for LoadBalancerVO

b6700aa

Add License text to LoadBalancerVOTest.java file

b59d525

Refactor LB CIDR list comparison & rollback code

019567b

- Replace manual null-check comparison with Objects.equals for clarity and null safety - Simplify CIDR list rollback to always restore backup value unconditionally - Add JavaDoc for setCidrList method for improved documentation

Added missing Import for java.util.Objects

8908186

boring-cyborg bot added component:api component:networking labels Sep 3, 2025

CodeBleu mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2025

Allow updating of Load Balancer source CIDR list #10968

Closed

14 tasks

CodeBleu requested review from DaanHoogland, weizhouapache, vishesh92 and Pearl1594 September 3, 2025 13:32

weizhouapache reviewed Sep 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

server/src/main/java/com/cloud/network/lb/LoadBalancingRulesManagerImpl.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Removed duplicate import

83ec190

weizhouapache reviewed Sep 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

...main/java/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/loadbalancer/UpdateLoadBalancerRuleCmd.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Added since to api parameter

3ee8482

weizhouapache approved these changes Sep 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

Pearl1594 approved these changes Sep 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

engine/schema/src/main/java/com/cloud/network/dao/LoadBalancerVO.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Fix typo

2fabc02

harikrishna-patnala approved these changes Sep 4, 2025

View reviewed changes

harikrishna-patnala added this to Apache CloudStack 4.22.0 Sep 4, 2025

harikrishna-patnala added this to the 4.22.0 milestone Sep 4, 2025

DaanHoogland added the status:needs-testing label Sep 8, 2025

github-actions bot added the status:has-conflicts label Sep 11, 2025

Allow updating of Load Balancer source CIDR list #11568

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Allow updating of Load Balancer source CIDR list #11568

Conversation

CodeBleu commented Sep 3, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Switching base to main from 4.19 , SEE #10968 for Comment history

Description

Types of changes

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

Bug Severity

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

weizhouapache left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

weizhouapache commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

Pearl1594 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Pearl1594 commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

CodeBleu commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

weizhouapache commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

harikrishna-patnala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 4, 2025

Uh oh!

CodeBleu commented Sep 5, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

DaanHoogland commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

CodeBleu commented Sep 3, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Switching base to `main` from `4.19` , SEE #10968 for Comment history

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2025 •

edited

Loading

CodeBleu commented Sep 5, 2025 •

edited

Loading