Skip to content

Conversation

lightoze
Copy link

No description provided.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jul 25, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@@ -64,8 +64,11 @@ public static RetryOptions merge(MethodRetry r, RetryOptions o) {
} else {
builder.setBackoffCoefficient(DEFAULT_BACKOFF_COEFFICIENT);
}
int maximumAttempts = merge(r.maximumAttempts(), o.getMaximumAttempts(), int.class);
if (maximumAttempts != 0) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no sure if I follow that. How is zero different from null in the processing? Could you provide the code link?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shijiesheng I think the point is setMaximumAttempts method throws exception if the value is 0.
The value 0 is default and a valid value if "expiration" is set.
Unfortunately I cannot build the project locally because of thrift 0.9.3 not available on linux currently but test like that should show it:

public class RetryOptionsTest {
  @Test
  public void testUnlimitedRetryWithExpiration() throws NoSuchMethodException {
    RetryOptions topLevelOption =
        new RetryOptions.Builder().setExpiration(Duration.ofSeconds(5)).build();
    MethodRetry methodRetry =
        UnlimitedRetry.class.getMethod("retry").getAnnotation(MethodRetry.class);
    RetryOptions retryOptions = RetryOptions.merge(methodRetry, topLevelOption);
    Assert.assertEquals(
        "Top level options must take precedence", 5, retryOptions.getExpiration().getSeconds());
  }

  private interface UnlimitedRetry {
    @ActivityMethod
    @MethodRetry(expirationSeconds = 100)
    void retry();
  }
}

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1886

  • 3 of 3 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.02%) to 60.409%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1863: 0.02%
Covered Lines: 11125
Relevant Lines: 18416

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants