-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 222
Remove Inactive Users FI WG #1322
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
According to the rules for inactivity defined in [RFC-0025](https://github.com/cloudfoundry/community/blob/main/toc/rfc/rfc-0025-define-criteria-and-removal-process-for-inactive-members.md), the following users should be removed from ARI approvers/reviewers: @bgandon @max-soe @ichandrabhatta @yharish991 @nouseforaname @pivotalgeorge @tas-operability-bot @cunnie According to the [revocation policy in the RFC](https://github.com/cloudfoundry/community/blob/main/toc/rfc/rfc-0025-define-criteria-and-removal-process-for-inactive-members.md#remove-the-membership-to-the-cloud-foundry-github-organization), users have two weeks to refute this revocation, if they wish by commenting on this pull-request and open a new pull-request to be re-added as approver after this one is merged. Please also state a reason why you would like to be re-added. Inactivity was detected by a github action, see #1318 I took @joefitzgerald and @colins out based on the discussions in #1271 @yharish991 could you please state a reason why you and @tas-operability-bot should presered the role?
@beyhan, our team at Broadcom maintains the https://github.com/cloudfoundry/disaster-recovery-acceptance-tests repository. While we don't contribute frequently, we would like to retain access for future purposes. We use @tas-operability-bot to automate dependency bumps, so we would also like to maintain access for this account. |
Hi @beyhan , I know I've been inactive for a while after I left Broadcom. I'm currently working on a new cpi for stackit cloud and will soon start creating PRs again. |
Hi @beyhan , |
Hi @yharish991, @nouseforaname, @ichandrabhatta, |
@yharish991 on:
I see no activity from the bot on that repo. Dependency bumps seem to be done by Dependabot. |
please open prs do be re-added as discussed @yharish991, @nouseforaname, @ichandrabhatta |
According to the rules for inactivity defined in RFC-0025, the following users should be removed from ARI approvers/reviewers: @bgandon
@max-soe
@ichandrabhatta
@yharish991
@nouseforaname
@pivotalgeorge
@tas-operability-bot
@cunnie
According to the revocation policy in the RFC, users have two weeks to refute this revocation, if they wish by commenting on this pull-request and open a new pull-request to be re-added as approver after this one is merged. Please also state a reason why you would like to be re-added. Inactivity was detected by a github action, see #1318
I took @joefitzgerald and @colins out based on the discussions in #1271
@yharish991 could you please state a reason why you and @tas-operability-bot should presered the role?