Move "Parts with Imports" to a separate proposal. #4469
+2,091
−2,069
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In #3939, there seemed to be consensus that "parts with imports" should be its own proposal with its own experiment flag. This PR does that. While I was at it, I renamed "Augmentation libraries" to just "Augmentations" (since it's not a new kind of library anymore) and gave that an experiment flag too. There are no changes to the text of either proposal. (Well, I did get rid of smart quotes in the parts with imports one...) Fix #3939.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In #3939, there seemed to be consensus that "parts with imports" should be its own proposal with its own experiment flag. This PR does that. While I was at it, I renamed "Augmentation libraries" to just "Augmentations" (since it's not a new kind of library anymore) and gave that an experiment flag too.
There are no changes to the text of either proposal. (Well, I did get rid of smart quotes in the parts with imports one...)
Fix #3939.
cc @dart-lang/language-team in case anyone disagrees with this move.