Remove username example from compound words #43346
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dotnetrepoman
bot
added
dotnet-fundamentals/svc
dotnet/svc
standard-library/subsvc
labels
dotnet-policy-service
bot
added
the
community-contribution
|
#sign-off |
|
I'm going to close this without merging it. This content is republished content, and the copyright holder is Addison-Wesley. Our agreement with them doesn't allow us to modify it. Thank you for contributing. If you have other suggestions, we're happy to watch for them. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR removes the
UserNameoverUsernameexample from the compound words table.Reason for Change
Both identifiers are valid in their own way:
UserNamerefers to the name of a user (e.g.Hazel).Usernamerefers to a pseudonym used to identify a user (e.g.tacosontitan)Including these in the compound words table with a focus on preferring
UserNameis misleading to the semantic differences between them.Internal previews