This guide is a step-by-step breakdown of how to approach prompt engineering and training large language models (LLMs), drawing from real-world processes used in production-level systems like GPT-4, Claude, and LLaMA, and enriched with techniques from LearnPrompting.org. Whether you're fine-tuning a foundation model or building domain-specific LLMs, this guide covers foundational theory, advanced training strategies, and alignment methodologies.
- 🧠 Understanding LLMs
- 💬 What is Prompt Engineering?
- 🧩 Prompt Taxonomy & Structures
- 🧹 Dataset Preparation for Pretraining
- 🔧 Phase I – Pretraining the LLM
- 🧪 Phase II – Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT)
- 🎮 Phase III – RLHF (Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback)
- 🔬 Advanced Prompt Engineering Techniques
- 🧪 Evaluation & Alignment Strategies
- 🚀 Best Practices for Production Readiness
- 📚 Glossary & Resources
Large Language Models are deep neural networks trained on massive text corpora to predict the next token in a sequence. They use:
- Transformer architecture (decoder-only models like GPT)
- Tokenization techniques (e.g., BPE, SentencePiece)
- Self-supervised objectives (next-token prediction)
GPT-4, Claude, and LLaMA are trained on trillions of tokens across diverse data domains.
Prompt engineering is the science of designing inputs to steer an LLM's behavior. It helps achieve:
- Task control
- Response formatting
- Safety and bias mitigation
- Output quality tuning
- Zero-shot: No examples
- Few-shot: 1–5 demos
- Chain-of-thought: Encourages stepwise reasoning
- Self-refinement: Prompts that ask the model to critique/improve its own output
- Contrastive: Provide multiple options to compare and improve
Based on LearnPrompting.org:
- Instruction: “Summarize the following:”
- Context: Background definitions
- Input: User’s content
- Output Indicator: “Answer:” or
\n
- Information-seeking
- Creative generation
- Reasoning and logic
- Tool invocation (e.g., ReAct prompting)
- Web: Common Crawl, Wikipedia, news
- Structured: Books3, ArXiv, GitHub
- Instructional: ShareGPT, FLAN, Dolly, Alpaca
- Domain-specific: Legal, medical, financial corpora
- De-duplication (MinHash, SHA)
- Language detection
- Toxicity filtering
- Tokenization
- Tiered sampling
Goal: Teach the model general linguistic knowledge.
- Decoder-only transformer
- Context size: 2K–128K tokens
- 6B to 180B parameters (depending on scale)
- Objective: Causal Language Modeling (CLM)
- Optimizer: AdamW + warmup/cosine decay
- Precision: fp16, bf16
- Techniques: DeepSpeed, Megatron, FSDP
Run on thousands of A100/H100 GPUs over 4–10 weeks.
Adapt the model to follow human instructions.
- Prompt–response pairs
- Human-labeled or synthetic
- Diverse tasks: summarization, Q&A, coding, reasoning
- Lower learning rate (e.g., 1e-5)
- 3–10 training epochs
- Monitor validation perplexity
Align models with human values (helpfulness, harmlessness, honesty).
- Generate responses per prompt
- Rank responses via human annotators
- Train a reward model
- Optimize base model using PPO (Proximal Policy Optimization)
- HuggingFace TRL
- OpenAI’s PPO pipelines
- Constitutional AI (Claude-style alignment)
- ReAct: Reason and act with tools
- Self-consistency: Sample multiple outputs, vote
- Toolformer: Model selects API calls in-line
- Reflexion: Self-critique and revise
- Persona conditioning: Control tone, empathy, professionalism
- BLEU, ROUGE, BERTScore
- TruthfulQA, Winogrande, MMLU
- Pairwise comparisons
- Scoring on coherence, logic, safety
- Adversarial red-teaming
- Refusal training
- Self-reflection
- Rule-based prompting (e.g., Constitutional AI)
- Quantization (4-bit, 8-bit)
- LoRA/PEFT for cost-effective finetuning
- Inference: Triton, vLLM, HuggingFace Inference Endpoints
- Guardrails and filters
- Abuse detection
- Logging + continuous feedback loops
template = """
Question: {question}
Think step-by-step and explain your reasoning.
Answer: {answer}
"""
Try the interactive toxicity analyzer below, powered by 🤗 Hugging Face Spaces!