You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I found the problematic PR from the geronimo issue. Notice how this PR introduces two WSS4J dependencies and only one of them has Geronimo excluded (I've verified via dependency tree that both pull Geronimo as a dependency). I've tested adding the exclusion for both and Geronimo dissapears from the models dependency tree.
Should I add the exclusion here and work with @sgrampone to merge this into master?
dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency file
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue:102316
Bump wss4j from version 1.6.19 to version 2.4.3
Fix transitive dependencies CVE´s
#GXSEC