Skip to content

gitignore some documentation-related outputs #520

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ethanc8
Copy link
Contributor

@ethanc8 ethanc8 commented Jul 12, 2025

This only changes .gitignore.

@ethanc8 ethanc8 requested a review from rfm as a code owner July 12, 2025 18:58
Copy link
Member

@ivucica ivucica left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like none of these are checked in now. LGTM.

Before merge, I'd consider updating the commit text (git commit --amend) to document why the changes are needed, where the files come from during the build, etc. Future readers might be as interested as I am right now. Or do it in the .gitignore itself.

Optional, however, as this is a minor request.

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Tests/base/*/GNUmakefile
*.sum
Tools/BaseTools/dependencies
Source/gnustep-base.pc
Tools/Resources/autogsdoc/default-styles.css
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems to be copied from one level up, LGTM

@@ -111,3 +112,7 @@ Documentation/manual/manual.*
**/dependencies
Source/Base.gsdoc
Source/BaseAdditions.gsdoc
Documentation/manual/gs-base.info
Documentation/manual/gs-base
Documentation/gs-standards
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These three seem to also come from elsewhere.

Could you update at least the commit text to document where they came from?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants