Skip to content

powerpc64/bpf: Add jit support for load_acquire and store_release #9317

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: bpf-next_base
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kernel-patches-daemon-bpf[bot]
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: powerpc64/bpf: Add jit support for load_acquire and store_release
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=983474

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: 0768e98
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=983474
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: 0768e98
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=983501
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: 0ee30d9
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=983501
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: 0ee30d9
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=983501
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: beb1097
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=983501
version: 1

@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: 42be23e
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=983501
version: 1

1 similar comment
@kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Copy link
Author

Upstream branch: 42be23e
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=983501
version: 1

Add JIT support for the load_acquire and store_release instructions. The
implementation is similar to the kernel where:

        load_acquire  => plain load -> lwsync
        store_release => lwsync -> plain store

To test the correctness of the implementation, following selftests were
run:

  [fedora@linux-kernel bpf]$ sudo ./test_progs -a \
  verifier_load_acquire,verifier_store_release,atomics
  #11/1    atomics/add:OK
  #11/2    atomics/sub:OK
  #11/3    atomics/and:OK
  #11/4    atomics/or:OK
  #11/5    atomics/xor:OK
  #11/6    atomics/cmpxchg:OK
  #11/7    atomics/xchg:OK
  #11      atomics:OK
  #519/1   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 8-bit:OK
  #519/2   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 8-bit @unpriv:OK
  #519/3   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 16-bit:OK
  #519/4   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 16-bit @unpriv:OK
  #519/5   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 32-bit:OK
  #519/6   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 32-bit @unpriv:OK
  #519/7   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 64-bit:OK
  #519/8   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire, 64-bit @unpriv:OK
  #519/9   verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with uninitialized
  src_reg:OK
  #519/10  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with uninitialized src_reg
  @unpriv:OK
  #519/11  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with non-pointer src_reg:OK
  #519/12  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with non-pointer src_reg
  @unpriv:OK
  #519/13  verifier_load_acquire/misaligned load-acquire:OK
  #519/14  verifier_load_acquire/misaligned load-acquire @unpriv:OK
  #519/15  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from ctx pointer:OK
  #519/16  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from ctx pointer @unpriv:OK
  #519/17  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with invalid register R15:OK
  #519/18  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire with invalid register R15
  @unpriv:OK
  #519/19  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from pkt pointer:OK
  #519/20  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from flow_keys pointer:OK
  #519/21  verifier_load_acquire/load-acquire from sock pointer:OK
  #519     verifier_load_acquire:OK
  #556/1   verifier_store_release/store-release, 8-bit:OK
  #556/2   verifier_store_release/store-release, 8-bit @unpriv:OK
  #556/3   verifier_store_release/store-release, 16-bit:OK
  #556/4   verifier_store_release/store-release, 16-bit @unpriv:OK
  #556/5   verifier_store_release/store-release, 32-bit:OK
  #556/6   verifier_store_release/store-release, 32-bit @unpriv:OK
  #556/7   verifier_store_release/store-release, 64-bit:OK
  #556/8   verifier_store_release/store-release, 64-bit @unpriv:OK
  #556/9   verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized
  src_reg:OK
  #556/10  verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized src_reg
  @unpriv:OK
  #556/11  verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized
  dst_reg:OK
  #556/12  verifier_store_release/store-release with uninitialized dst_reg
  @unpriv:OK
  #556/13  verifier_store_release/store-release with non-pointer
  dst_reg:OK
  #556/14  verifier_store_release/store-release with non-pointer dst_reg
  @unpriv:OK
  #556/15  verifier_store_release/misaligned store-release:OK
  #556/16  verifier_store_release/misaligned store-release @unpriv:OK
  #556/17  verifier_store_release/store-release to ctx pointer:OK
  #556/18  verifier_store_release/store-release to ctx pointer @unpriv:OK
  #556/19  verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to stack:OK
  #556/20  verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to stack
  @unpriv:OK
  #556/21  verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to map:OK
  #556/22  verifier_store_release/store-release, leak pointer to map
  @unpriv:OK
  #556/23  verifier_store_release/store-release with invalid register
  R15:OK
  #556/24  verifier_store_release/store-release with invalid register R15
  @unpriv:OK
  #556/25  verifier_store_release/store-release to pkt pointer:OK
  #556/26  verifier_store_release/store-release to flow_keys pointer:OK
  #556/27  verifier_store_release/store-release to sock pointer:OK
  #556     verifier_store_release:OK
  Summary: 3/55 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant