go.mod+go.sum: itest changes in neutrino PR "320"

[mohamedawnallah]

Change Description

Related PR lightninglabs/neutrino#320

Motivation and Context

Discussed in lightninglabs/neutrino#320 (review)

Steps to Test

Steps for reviewers to follow to test the change.

Pull Request Checklist

Testing

• Your PR passes all CI checks.
• Tests covering the positive and negative (error paths) are included.
• Bug fixes contain tests triggering the bug to prevent regressions.

Code Style and Documentation

• The change is not insubstantial. Typo fixes are not accepted to fight bot spam.
• The change obeys the Code Documentation and Commenting guidelines, and lines wrap at 80.
• Commits follow the Ideal Git Commit Structure.
• Any new logging statements use an appropriate subsystem and logging level.
• Any new lncli commands have appropriate tags in the comments for the rpc in the proto file.
• There is a change description in the release notes, or [skip ci] in the commit message for small changes.

📝 Please see our Contribution Guidelines for further guidance.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @mohamedawnallah, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the project's go.mod file to temporarily use a specific fork of the neutrino module. This change is intended to facilitate integration testing against unreleased modifications from a related neutrino pull request, ensuring compatibility and functionality before the upstream changes are merged.

Highlights

• Dependency Management: This pull request introduces a replace directive in the go.mod file. This directive redirects the github.com/lightninglabs/neutrino module to a specific fork (github.com/mohamedawnallah/neutrino) at version v0.16.1-failGracefullyOnDBHeaderWrites. This is typically done to allow the project to build and test against unmerged or in-progress changes from a dependency, as indicated by the PR title referencing 'neutrino PR "320"'.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the go.mod file to replace the official neutrino dependency with a personal fork. This is a significant change that introduces security and maintainability risks. My review highlights this critical issue and recommends reverting this change before merging, and instead, getting the necessary changes merged upstream into the official neutrino repository. Additionally, the pull request description is currently a template and should be filled out to provide context for this change.