Skip to content

fix: bump httpx version #568

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 21, 2025
Merged

Conversation

chuwt
Copy link
Contributor

@chuwt chuwt commented Jul 18, 2025

the version is different:

This is the code in version 0.23 with name proxies:
https://github.com/encode/httpx/blob/89cdd903b2f339c6ae319773c31b8c9352bd9cd8/httpx/_client.py#L1353

This is the code in version 0.28 with name proxy:
https://github.com/encode/httpx/blob/4fb9528c2f5ac000441c3634d297e77da23067cd/httpx/_client.py#L1364

link to #566

@michaelhly
Copy link
Owner

michaelhly commented Jul 18, 2025

@chuwt would you mind fixing:

pyproject.toml changed significantly since poetry.lock was last generated. Run poetry lock [--no-update] to fix the lock file.

@chuwt
Copy link
Contributor Author

chuwt commented Jul 19, 2025

Sure, fixed lock file.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.77%. Comparing base (4b71831) to head (b1e3527).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #568   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.77%   91.77%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        2236     2236           
=======================================
  Hits         2052     2052           
  Misses        184      184           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@michaelhly michaelhly merged commit 1ff6031 into michaelhly:master Jul 21, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants