-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 246
DRIVERS-1934: withTransaction API retries too frequently #1851
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
callbacks. | ||
|
||
A previous design had no limits for retrying commits or entire transactions. The callback is always able indicate that | ||
A previous design had no limits for retrying commits or entire transactions. The callback is always able to indicate that |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe I read it wrong, or maybe its a typo? Not sure.
[abortTransaction](../transactions/transactions.md#aborttransaction) on the session. | ||
2. If the callback's error includes a "TransientTransactionError" label and the elapsed time of `withTransaction` is | ||
less than 120 seconds, jump back to step two. | ||
less than 120 seconds, sleep for `jitter * min(BACKOFF_INITIAL * (1.25**retry), BACKOFF_MAX)` where: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know python uses **
as the exponential operator. I don't believe that is a standard across other programming languages. Is it clear that its exponent? Is there a different preferred symbol for exponent? (I know math commonly uses ^
but it typically also means bitwise XOR in code so I felt like that could be confusing.)
### Retry Backoff is Enforced | ||
|
||
Drivers should test that retries within `withTransaction` do not occur immediately. Ideally, set BACKOFF_INITIAL 500ms | ||
and configure a failpoint that forces one retry. Ensure that the operation took more than 500ms so succeed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test would not work as described because jitter is non-deterministic.
An alternative test would be to use a failpoint to fail the transaction X times and then assert the overall time is larger than some threshold.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I realized that when implementing it. I set the fail point to fail 3 times and that seems to be consistently working (and without jitter failing 3 times would still cause the success to happen within 500ms)
|
||
A previous design had no limits for retrying commits or entire transactions. The callback is always able indicate that | ||
`withTransaction` should return to its caller (without future retry attempts) by aborting the transaction directly; | ||
A previous design had no limits for retrying commits or entire transactions. The callback is always able to indicate |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest we add a section in the Design Rationale to cover why we think it's beneficial to introduce backoff. And another section explaining why we choose the parameters 1ms initial, 1.25 growth, and 500ms max.
Please complete the following before merging:
clusters).