Skip to content

chore(deps): update jest monorepo to v30 (major) #1975

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 15, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@types/jest (source) 29.5.14 -> 30.0.0 age adoption passing confidence
jest (source) 29.7.0 -> 30.0.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jestjs/jest (jest)

v30.0.1

Compare Source

v30.0.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-jest-monorepo branch 4 times, most recently from 50ba410 to 18d894c Compare June 16, 2025 15:35
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency jest to v30 chore(deps): update jest monorepo to v30 (major) Jun 16, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-jest-monorepo branch 3 times, most recently from b814554 to 3f53c85 Compare June 17, 2025 19:58
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-jest-monorepo branch from 3f53c85 to 559a726 Compare June 18, 2025 23:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants