Skip to content

feat!: enable manual caching of edge function responses #361

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 14, 2025

Conversation

macgors
Copy link
Contributor

@macgors macgors commented Jun 30, 2025

feat: enable manual caching from edge

  • Change edge function's config to support manual caching.
  • Add Caching section to README.

Issue #360

@macgors macgors requested a review from a team as a code owner June 30, 2025 09:36
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Deploy Preview for plugin-angular-universal-demo ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4b9ab8d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/plugin-angular-universal-demo/deploys/689ccb62d84d6900088a55aa
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-361--plugin-angular-universal-demo.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Member

@serhalp serhalp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you for the contribution!

I think we'll have to make this a major since it technically changes existing behaviour (previously cache response headers would have been ignored)

@serhalp serhalp self-assigned this Aug 13, 2025
@serhalp serhalp changed the title feat: enable manual caching from edge feat!: enable manual caching of edge function responses Aug 14, 2025
@serhalp serhalp merged commit efee061 into netlify:main Aug 14, 2025
12 checks passed
@serhalp serhalp linked an issue Aug 14, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
serhalp added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
#361 was
meant to be marked as `feat!:` but I messed up when squash-merging
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow for Angular SSR response caching
4 participants