Patent and Tech

[heydoyouknowme0]

No description provided.

[Aryawart-kathpal]

@Soumil221 isn't it the same as the one that I had merged patents-and-technologies vaali?

[heydoyouknowme0]

Again staged and master if you want to run separately you will have to merge stuff separately too
Also some minor oversight in the original pr too while fixing pagination

[Aryawart-kathpal]

@heydoyouknowme0 why can't we raise a PR from staged to master, after having the code reviewed that has been merged to staged and is ahead of master.

[heydoyouknowme0]

Again if you can guarantee the code quality, clean up the tree for staged, manually check for incomplete code for each commit after master, go ahead. The point of this site is long term maintainability and sustainability, not one and done. You can keep updating staged for meeting deadlines in the short term but that doesn't overwrite existing standards.

[Aryawart-kathpal]

I think we can have a small discussion on this.. whenever you have time

[heydoyouknowme0]

Also, @aryansri-19 and I can maintain master for you, merging and keeping track of the commits that have been merged to staged, just like this commit. So you don't have to worry about this branch and can just focus on deployments.

That's until both of the branches achieve feature parity.

[Aryawart-kathpal]

This would be very good😊