Skip to content

8358749: Fix input checks in Vector API intrinsics #25673

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Jun 6, 2025

We have been carrying this patch in Leyden/premain for a while: openjdk/leyden@7faed7f. I believe it deserves to be in mainline. I polished it a little further.

It is mostly a cleanup, but there are also new checks, on the paths where we do take constants off the arguments. In those cases, I believe the alternative is compiler SEGV-ing.

Additional testing:

  • Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, hotspot_vector_1 hotspot_vector_2
  • Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, jdk_vector

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8358749: Fix input checks in Vector API intrinsics (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Contributors

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25673/head:pull/25673
$ git checkout pull/25673

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25673
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25673/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25673

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25673

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25673.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Jun 6, 2025

/contributor add @iwanowww

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 6, 2025

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 6, 2025

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8358749: Fix input checks in Vector API intrinsics

Co-authored-by: Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: vlivanov, sviswanathan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 6, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 6, 2025

@shipilev
Contributor Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]> successfully added.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 6, 2025

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 6, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@iwanowww iwanowww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Thanks for taking care of upstreaming it.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 6, 2025
Copy link

@sviswa7 sviswa7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me as well.

@ExE-Boss
Copy link

ExE-Boss commented Jun 6, 2025

Also note that the implementation of Utils.isNonCapturingLambda(…) is wrong when the jdk.internal.lambda.disableEagerInitialization system property is set to "true", as that causes lambda classes to have one static final field:

public static boolean isNonCapturingLambda(Object o) {
return o.getClass().getDeclaredFields().length == 0;
}

private void generateClassInitializer(ClassBuilder clb) {
ClassDesc lambdaTypeDescriptor = classDesc(factoryType.returnType());
// Generate the static final field that holds the lambda singleton
clb.withField(LAMBDA_INSTANCE_FIELD, lambdaTypeDescriptor, ACC_PRIVATE | ACC_STATIC | ACC_FINAL);
// Instantiate the lambda and store it to the static final field
clb.withMethodBody(CLASS_INIT_NAME, MTD_void, ACC_STATIC, new Consumer<>() {

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler [email protected] ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants