-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
0723 agricolture #18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
0723 agricolture #18
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @mzecc changes look like they make sense.
Two questions:
- did you also manually check that the aggregation works (numbers add up fine?) with an example?
- why is the uv.lock changing?
Before approving, I will also still try to run the tests and then I suppose we're good to go.
For https://github.com/openscm/gcages/blob/main/tests/regression/cmip7-scenariomip/test-data/salted-202504-scenariomip-input.csv, the pre-processing (like here) using this notebook (placed in gcages root folder): https://github.com/jkikstra/gcages/blob/pr/18-jsk/test_basic_aggregation.py, I can confirm that the aggregation works as expected. |
But
|
I have updated the salted (test) file we checked. Everything looks consistent to me. |
Made the changes to handle the fact that AFOLU emissions will not be provided as gridded emissions. |
Thanks @mzecc. I had thought to maybe work in 3 PRs to keep the chunks easy-to-review (test, check, run, document):
|
Yes, I agree. Thanks @jkikstra. I'll start a new PR. This one seems complete to me. |
Description
AWB instances reclassified back into Agriculture
Checklist
Please confirm that this pull request has done the following:
changelog/