Skip to content

OBSDOCS-2161: Loki object storage command format #96168

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

theashiot
Copy link
Contributor

@theashiot theashiot commented Jul 16, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 16, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2161 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 6.3

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2161

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 16, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 16, 2025

@theashiot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @theashiot ,
Thanks for raising a PR for this change.
Changes look good to me.
We are good to proceed further.

Thanks,
Prithviraj Patil

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @prithvipatil97!

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jul 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 16, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2161 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 6.3

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2161

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@abrennan89 abrennan89 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Jul 17, 2025
@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 18, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2161 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 6.3

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2161

Link to docs preview:

QE review: Not required as this is only a cosmetic change.

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @abrennan89!

@theashiot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jul 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 21, 2025

@theashiot: This pull request references OBSDOCS-2161 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 6.3

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2161

Link to docs preview:

QE review: Not required as this is only a cosmetic change.

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added logging and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Jul 21, 2025
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz merged commit 8ec25c9 into openshift:standalone-logging-docs-main Jul 21, 2025
2 checks passed
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.3

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #96417

In response to this:

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. logging peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants