Skip to content

Conversation

dkharms
Copy link
Member

@dkharms dkharms commented Sep 29, 2025

Description

Note

Please add benchmarks comparison.

TODO


  • I have read and followed all requirements in CONTRIBUTING.md;
  • I used LLM/AI assistance to make this pull request;

If you have used LLM/AI assistance please provide model name and full prompt:

Model: {{model-name}}
Prompt: {{prompt}}

@dkharms dkharms self-assigned this Sep 29, 2025
@dkharms dkharms added the performance Features or improvements that positively affect seq-db performance label Sep 29, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 71.39%. Comparing base (abd6bfb) to head (ca4a300).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #160      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.37%   71.39%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         200      200              
  Lines       18191    18182       -9     
==========================================
- Hits        12984    12981       -3     
+ Misses       4492     4487       -5     
+ Partials      715      714       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
performance Features or improvements that positively affect seq-db performance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants