100% test coverage

[blakeembrey]

Fixing up 100% test coverage cases, additionally shifting some bytes around for readability and size (mainly the .map to a for loop to make the recursive case more obvious).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (85e5e2c) to head (2a3d359).

Additional details and impacted files

@@                     Coverage Diff                     @@
##           be/debug-original-path      #396      +/-   ##
===========================================================
+ Coverage                   99.21%   100.00%   +0.78%     
===========================================================
  Files                           1         1              
  Lines                         381       396      +15     
  Branches                      132       138       +6     
===========================================================
+ Hits                          378       396      +18     
+ Misses                          3         0       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[blakeembrey]

Pulled name function out (which adds bytes) because it's needed to avoid a crash on name being missing before the token type error.

[blakeembrey]