-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 704
security: add steps to validate TLS between components (#21811) #21893
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
security: add steps to validate TLS between components (#21811) #21893
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
@YangKeao This PR has conflicts, I have hold it. |
@ti-chi-bot: ## If you want to know how to resolve it, please read the guide in TiDB Dev Guide. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
Summary of ChangesHello @ti-chi-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the documentation related to securing TiDB clusters by providing explicit, actionable steps for users to validate TLS communication between different components. It also updates an old documentation link and adds configuration guidance for TiProxy, making it easier for users to ensure their deployments are securely configured and verifiable. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds valuable documentation on how to validate TLS between TiDB components. I've identified a critical issue with merge conflict markers that need to be resolved. I also have a few suggestions to improve the clarity and correctness of the new content, including clarifying the TiFlash port and fixing the TOML syntax in an example. Once these are addressed, this will be a great addition to the documentation.
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hfxsd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #21811
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Add several steps to validate the TLS between components.
It only applys for the components with a server. If this component only acts like a client, it's not easy to validate whether it communicates with others only through TLS (I think the only way to check this is by capturing the packet).
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?