Skip to content

Generalize benchmark_module function #3223

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SSYernar
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: Previously benchmark_module was compatible only with EmbeddingCollection and EmbeddingBagCollection modules. This change generalizes the function to take any nn.module and run benchmarks on given Sharding Types and Compile Modes. Additional module wrapper was introduced for Embedding modules including EC, EBC, QEC, QEBC to ensure the compatibility of ModelInput with given modules as they only take KeyedJaggedTensor for input.

Differential Revision: D78586820

Summary: Previously `benchmark_module`  was compatible only with `EmbeddingCollection` and `EmbeddingBagCollection` modules. This change generalizes the function to take any `nn.module` and run benchmarks on given Sharding Types and Compile Modes. Additional module wrapper was introduced for Embedding modules including `EC`, `EBC`, `QEC`, `QEBC` to ensure the compatibility of ModelInput with given modules as they only take `KeyedJaggedTensor` for input.

Differential Revision: D78586820
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jul 22, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D78586820

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants