Skip to content

Replace rmq_qos_profile_t with rclcpp::QoS #1106

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: rolling
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ahcorde
Copy link
Contributor

@ahcorde ahcorde commented Jul 7, 2025

Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez Cordero <[email protected]>
@ahcorde ahcorde requested a review from mikeferguson July 21, 2025 08:04
@ahcorde
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahcorde commented Jul 21, 2025

can you take a look @asymingt ?

Copy link
Member

@mikeferguson mikeferguson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good once CI passes (I presume we need to wait for the underlying changes to sync)

Copy link

@asymingt asymingt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just one nit.

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ ConvertMetricNode::ConvertMetricNode(const rclcpp::NodeOptions & options)
// Get transport hints
image_transport::TransportHints hints(this);
// Create subscriber with QoS matched to subscribed topic publisher
auto qos_profile = image_proc::getTopicQosProfile(this, topic);
rclcpp::QoS qos_profile = image_proc::getQosProfile(this, topic);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: There seems to be an inconsistency in this PR between whether we want to go auto qos_profile = ... or rclcpp::QoS qos_profile = .... It doesn't faze me which one we choose, but I think we should at least be internally consistent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants