-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 758
Replace rmq_qos_profile_t with rclcpp::QoS #1106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: rolling
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez Cordero <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez Cordero <[email protected]>
can you take a look @asymingt ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good once CI passes (I presume we need to wait for the underlying changes to sync)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just one nit.
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ ConvertMetricNode::ConvertMetricNode(const rclcpp::NodeOptions & options) | |||
// Get transport hints | |||
image_transport::TransportHints hints(this); | |||
// Create subscriber with QoS matched to subscribed topic publisher | |||
auto qos_profile = image_proc::getTopicQosProfile(this, topic); | |||
rclcpp::QoS qos_profile = image_proc::getQosProfile(this, topic); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: There seems to be an inconsistency in this PR between whether we want to go auto qos_profile = ...
or rclcpp::QoS qos_profile = ...
. It doesn't faze me which one we choose, but I think we should at least be internally consistent.
Related with ros-perception/image_common#364