Apply impl_super_outlives optimization to new trait solver

[compiler-errors]

I never did #128746 for the new solver.

r? lcnr

[compiler-errors]

Just for funsies

@bors2 try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

⌛ Trying commit 24ea06c with merge 06b3d3c…

To cancel the try build, run the command @bors2 try cancel.

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 06b3d3c (06b3d3c388ca170b3af5c88c3805eb4773f60db7, parent: 8de4c7234dd9b97c9d76b58671343fdbbc9a433e)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (06b3d3c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.6%	[0.5%, 0.8%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-0.6%, -0.2%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.4%, secondary 0.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	5.0%	[5.0%, 5.0%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.1%	[-2.1%, -2.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.2%	[-1.2%, -1.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.4%	[-2.1%, 5.0%]	2

Cycles

Results (primary 2.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 691.904s -> 690.865s (-0.15%)
Artifact size: 372.02 MiB -> 371.91 MiB (-0.03%)

[compiler-errors]

🤷 still worth I think. I think the coercions perf changes are not related.