Update a little and allow pulling to projects using jitpack.io #11
Conversation
|
|
||
| groupId = 'com.github.rust-mobile' | ||
| artifactId = 'rustview' | ||
| version = '1.0.0' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Version 1.0.0 seems optimistic here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I (and maintainers) can set any version, i used 1.0.0 just for check it is working
| from components.release | ||
|
|
||
| groupId = 'com.github.rust-mobile' | ||
| artifactId = 'rustview' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This name "rustview" isn't really something we've used for this before. I agree that "Android View" is a bit hard to justify here, but it's probably worth using that for now. rust-mobile already explains that this is Rust, so I think sticking with Android View is best
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the import was rustview and it is more correct because of android native library "Android View"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
because of android native library "Android View"
Can you please provide a link to this? I've been unable to find this through searching.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, i misunderstanded you. You ask about android lib. It is not in search because it's a part of native android. You can see it in code.
| afterEvaluate { | ||
| publishing { | ||
| publications { | ||
| release(MavenPublication) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To clarify, this is required for jitpack, right?
That is, this isn't doing automatic pushing to Maven Central?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is only for jitpack, MavenPublication is just class describing output format
| android { | ||
| compileSdk 31 | ||
| namespace 'org.linebender.android.rustview' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should be moved to com.github.rust-mobile (as the others should as well)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This namespace should be similar to projects folder structure as on screenshot in my previous comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Right. I guess we can make the move away from org.linebender a follow-up
| let _ = tracing_subscriber::registry() | ||
| tracing_subscriber::registry() | ||
| .with(tracing_android_trace::AndroidTraceLayer::new()) | ||
| .try_init(); | ||
| .init(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why was this change necessary? And why hasn't the comment above needed changing as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There may be panic if android platform specified incorrectly when using cargo ndk. Ignoring this possible error gives a false sense of security
|
I totally don't know who is Matt, i just needed it and found it in internet and did this changes for myself, i think it could be useful but feel free editing it |
No description provided.