Skip to content

Conversation

eduardo-rodrigues
Copy link
Member

@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues commented Apr 21, 2023

This is the new extended particle data file for the package, to be maintained by us.

It effectively amalgamates and organises for the better what we have been using from the good-old 2008 PDG file mass_width_2008.fwf (only released that one year!) to provide extended information, which required our own mass_width_2008_ext.fwf to implement various sorts of updates (particle PDG IDs changing over time, etc.) It was becoming slightly unmaintainable to continue this way, and certainly not optimal. This master file solves issues.

Closes #118.

@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues self-assigned this Apr 21, 2023
@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues changed the title Add skeleton of particle/data/mass_width_extended.fwf WIP: Add skeleton of particle/data/mass_width_extended.fwf Apr 21, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 21, 2023

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.10%. Comparing base (24969f7) to head (9c109f5).
⚠️ Report is 31 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #488      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.17%   96.10%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        1335     1335              
==========================================
- Hits         1284     1283       -1     
- Misses         51       52       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@eduardo-rodrigues
Copy link
Member Author

FYI @henryiii, @tamasgal and @redeboer since you showed interest in these files in the past. Feel free to add colleagues you know will be interested as well. I'm obviously very happy to receive any feedback.

In case you wonder - many values are dummy (-1) because they get overriden (on purpose) with information from the yearly PDG data files. This is to ensure the actual CSV file used by Particle contains always the latest and greatest info. Let me know if anything in unclear.

@redeboer
Copy link
Contributor

FYI @henryiii, @tamasgal and @redeboer since you showed interest in these files in the past. Feel free to add colleagues you know will be interested as well.

@mmikhasenko

@tamasgal
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

@8me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data files ⚙️ enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Put particle changes in 2008 file
4 participants