Skip to content

Use built-in sum instead of writing our own ad-hoc version #738

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 14, 2024
Merged

Use built-in sum instead of writing our own ad-hoc version #738

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
1e52d68
Use `sum` instead of writing our own
matthiasgoergens Dec 12, 2024
4c597d9
Fix
matthiasgoergens Dec 12, 2024
c7fe924
Merge branch 'master' into mathias/use-sum
matthiasgoergens Dec 12, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 1 addition & 3 deletions ceno_zkvm/src/uint/arithmetic.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -274,9 +274,7 @@ impl<const M: usize, const C: usize, E: ExtensionField> UIntLimbs<M, C, E> {
.into_iter()
.unzip();

let sum_expr = is_equal_per_limb
.iter()
.fold(Expression::ZERO, |acc, flag| acc.clone() + flag.expr());
let sum_expr = is_equal_per_limb.iter().map(ToExpr::expr).sum();

let sum_flag = WitIn::from_expr(|| "sum_flag", circuit_builder, sum_expr, false)?;
let (is_equal, diff_inv) =
Expand Down
4 changes: 1 addition & 3 deletions mpcs/src/sum_check/classic/coeff.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -49,9 +49,7 @@ impl<E: ExtensionField> ClassicSumCheckRoundMessage<E> for Coefficients<E> {
}

fn sum(&self) -> E {
self[1..]
.iter()
.fold(self[0].double(), |acc, coeff| acc + coeff)
self[0] + self[..].iter().sum::<E>()
Copy link
Contributor Author

@matthiasgoergens matthiasgoergens Dec 12, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doubling the first element is a bit weird. But the tests seem to expect it. What's the reason for it?

@yczhangsjtu I think you wrote that code? Could you please enlighten me? (I'll probably make a documenting comment out of your answer later.) Thanks!

}

fn evaluate(&self, _: &Self::Auxiliary, challenge: &E) -> E {
Expand Down