Skip to content

Conversation

rdeioris
Copy link
Contributor

@rdeioris rdeioris commented Sep 1, 2025

Description

This patch adds the first (of 3) new endpoints allowing getting the list of stacks blocks given a burnblock (here by consensus hash, next endpoints will cover height and block hash).

It is part (along the simulation block api #6346) of the features required by wormhole.

@rdeioris rdeioris requested review from a team as code owners September 1, 2025 13:31
Copy link
Contributor

@Jiloc Jiloc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are missing the update to the openapi spec

@rdeioris rdeioris requested review from jcnelson and Jiloc September 3, 2025 16:37
@rdeioris
Copy link
Contributor Author

rdeioris commented Sep 3, 2025

Note: i rollbacked the BurnHeaderHash usage as it serializes to an array of numbers by default.

Copy link
Member

@jcnelson jcnelson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM; just a couple nits and then I'll approve

@rdeioris rdeioris requested a review from jcnelson September 4, 2025 05:35
@rdeioris rdeioris requested a review from Jiloc September 4, 2025 11:57
Copy link
Contributor

@Jiloc Jiloc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waiting for the tests to wrap up before approving, but LGTM!

@rdeioris rdeioris requested a review from Jiloc September 4, 2025 14:30
Jiloc
Jiloc previously approved these changes Sep 4, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jcnelson jcnelson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM; just a doc typo needs to be fixed

@rdeioris rdeioris requested a review from Jiloc September 5, 2025 15:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants