Skip to content

Conversation

yuroitaki
Copy link
Member

@yuroitaki yuroitaki requested review from themighty1 and sinui0 April 4, 2025 06:35
@themighty1
Copy link
Member

will review soon

Copy link
Member

@themighty1 themighty1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gw

Copy link
Member

@sinui0 sinui0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good work!

Looking at this again, what do you think about simply returning (Vec<_>, Rhs)? It's now apparent this would be a simpler API, where the user can simply check if Rhs is empty to know whether it was fully covered.

@yuroitaki
Copy link
Member Author

Good work!

Looking at this again, what do you think about simply returning (Vec<_>, Rhs)? It's now apparent this would be a simpler API, where the user can simply check if Rhs is empty to know whether it was fully covered.

agreed, implemented :)

@yuroitaki yuroitaki requested review from themighty1 and sinui0 April 16, 2025 09:16
@sinui0 sinui0 merged commit 753b4b0 into dev Apr 16, 2025
3 checks passed
@sinui0 sinui0 deleted the feat/cover-enhancement branch April 16, 2025 09:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants