Add support for tmpfs mounts. #194
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
welp, tests failed because of deprecated image, just like on my local machine. Any suggestions? |
sourenaraya
force-pushed
the
feature/tmpfs
branch
from
753c354 to
0ecee0a
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add support for
tmpfsmounts.Why tmpfs at all?
In some cases tmpfs volume is much faster than anonymous volume. For example, on my machine postgres is so I/O bound, that mounting tmpfs to pgdata speeds things up up to 250% 🤕.
Bind mount directory inside /tmp would do, right?
Yes, but it is less convenient. I would have to create directory beforehand and remove it afterwards. And tox can't do that. Or, at least, i am not aware how.
Where is tests?
I am open for the ideas, how one would test tmpfs volume mount.
For now i added tmpfs volume to the
healthcheck-customcontainer.